Responsible use of chatbots to advance the laboratory hematology scientific literature: Challenges and opportunities

Affiliations

¹ Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
² Haemostasis Research Unit, University College London, London, UK.
³ Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
⁴ Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri, USA.

Editorial

Fabienne Lucas et al. Int J Lab Hematol. 2024 May.

. 2024 May:46 Suppl 1:9-11.

doi: 10.1111/ijlh.14285. Epub 2024 Apr 19.

¹ Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
² Haemostasis Research Unit, University College London, London, UK.
³ Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
⁴ Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri, USA.

No abstract available

References

1. Li J, Dada A, Puladi B, Kleesiek J, Egger J. ChatGPT in healthcare: a taxonomy and systematic review. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2024;245:108013.
1. Kung TH, Cheatham M, Medenilla A, et al. Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: potential for AI‐assisted medical education using large language models. PLOS Digit Health. 2023;2(2):e0000198.
1. Meyer A, Riese J, Streichert T. Comparison of the performance of GPT‐3.5 and GPT‐4 with that of medical students on the written German medical licensing examination: observational study. JMIR Med Educ. 2024;10:e50965.
1. Younis HA, Eisa TAE, Nasser M, et al. A systematic review and meta‐analysis of artificial intelligence tools in medicine and healthcare: applications, considerations, limitations, motivation and challenges. Diagnostics (Basel). 2024;14(1):109.
1. Watters C, Lemanski MK. Universal skepticism of ChatGPT: a review of early literature on chat generative pre‐trained transformer. Front Big Data. 2023;6:1224976.