Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Practice Guideline
. 2024 May;177(5):658-666.
doi: 10.7326/M23-2788. Epub 2024 Apr 19.

Newer Pharmacologic Treatments in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Clinical Guideline From the American College of Physicians

Collaborators, Affiliations
Practice Guideline

Newer Pharmacologic Treatments in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Clinical Guideline From the American College of Physicians

Amir Qaseem et al. Ann Intern Med. 2024 May.

Abstract

Description: The American College of Physicians (ACP) developed this clinical guideline to update recommendations on newer pharmacologic treatments of type 2 diabetes. This clinical guideline is based on the best available evidence for effectiveness, comparative benefits and harms, consideration of patients' values and preferences, and costs.

Methods: This clinical guideline is based on a systematic review of the effectiveness and harms of newer pharmacologic treatments of type 2 diabetes, including glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists, a GLP-1 agonist and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide agonist, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, and long-acting insulins, used either as monotherapy or in combination with other medications. The Clinical Guidelines Committee prioritized the following outcomes, which were evaluated using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach: all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for congestive heart failure, progression of chronic kidney disease, serious adverse events, and severe hypoglycemia. Weight loss, as measured by percentage of participants who achieved at least 10% total body weight loss, was a prioritized outcome, but data were insufficient for network meta-analysis and were not rated with GRADE.

Audience and patient population: The audience for this clinical guideline is physicians and other clinicians. The population is nonpregnant adults with type 2 diabetes.

Recommendation 1: ACP recommends adding a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitor or glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonist to metformin and lifestyle modifications in adults with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control (strong recommendation; high-certainty evidence). • Use an SGLT-2 inhibitor to reduce the risk for all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, progression of chronic kidney disease, and hospitalization due to congestive heart failure. • Use a GLP-1 agonist to reduce the risk for all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, and stroke.

Recommendation 2: ACP recommends against adding a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor to metformin and lifestyle modifications in adults with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control to reduce morbidity and all-cause mortality (strong recommendation; high-certainty evidence).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures: All financial and intellectual disclosures of interest were declared, and potential conflicts were discussed and managed. Dr. Owens was recused from authorship and voting due to a moderate-level conflict of interest (recently authored relevant publications). Dr. Wilt was recused from authorship and voting due to a moderate-level conflict (author of corresponding systematic review). A record of disclosures of interest and management of conflicts is kept for each Clinical Guidelines Committee meeting and conference call and can be viewed at www.acponline.org/clinical_information/guidelines/guidelines/conflicts_cgc.htm. Disclosures can also be viewed at www.acponline.org/authors/icmje/ConflictOfInterestForms.do?msNum=M23-2788.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Grading the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendations in ACP clinical guidelines using GRADE. ACP = American College of Physicians; GRADE = Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Summary of CGC interpretation of evidence for newer diabetes medications compared with usual care or placebo. Favors intervention (green) or favors comparator (red; not present in this figure) indicates a statistically significant difference between the intervention and comparison or a meaningful difference in effect size (i.e., ≥25% increase or decrease) with 95% CIs not crossing both lower (0.75) and upper (1.25) bounds. Italicized interpretation text indicates statistically significant findings. Statistics are from the American College of Physicians (ACP)–funded systematic review and network meta-analysis (24) available in Supplement Tables 1 to 4 (available at Annals.org). Interpretation of findings was done by the CGC. CGC = Clinical Guidelines Committee; CHF = congestive heart failure; CKD = chronic kidney disease; DPP-4 = dipeptidyl peptidase-4; GLP-1 = glucagon-like peptide-1; MACE = major adverse cardiovascular events; MI = myocardial infarction; SAE = serious adverse event; SGLT-2 = sodium–glucose cotransporter-2. * SAEs were defined by investigators, varied, and were not always fully reported. In general, these SAEs included events considered fatal or life-threatening and incorporated events (e.g., stroke, MI) that could also be a clinical benefit (through a reduction) with type 2 diabetes treatment (24). Long-acting insulins and sulfonylureas directly cause hypoglycemia and were used either as a direct comparator or within usual care, which may distort findings.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Summary of CGC interpretation of evidence for DPP-4 inhibitors, GLP-1 agonists, and SGLT-2 inhibitors compared with other active treatments. Favors intervention (green) or favors comparator (red) indicates a statistically significant difference between the intervention and comparison or a meaningful difference in effect size (i.e., ≥25% increase or decrease) with 95% CIs not crossing both lower (0.75) and upper (1.25) bounds. Italicized interpretation text indicates statistically significant findings. Statistics are from the American College of Physicians–funded systematic review and network meta-analysis (24) available in Supplement Tables 1 to 4 (available at Annals.org). Interpretation of findings was done by the CGC. CGC = Clinical Guidelines Committee; CHF = congestive heart failure; CKD = chronic kidney disease; DPP-4 = dipeptidyl peptidase-4; GLP-1 = glucagon-like peptide-1; MACE = major adverse cardiovascular events; MI = myocardial infarction; SAE = serious adverse event; SGLT-2, sodium–glucose cotransporter-2. * SAEs were defined by investigators, varied, and were not always fully reported. In general, these SAEs included events considered fatal or life-threatening and incorporated events (e.g., stroke, MI) that could also be a clinical benefit (through a reduction) with type 2 diabetes treatment (24). Long-acting insulins and sulfonylureas directly cause hypoglycemia and were used either as a direct comparator or within usual care, which may distort findings.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Summary of CGC interpretation of evidence for DPP-4 inhibitors, GLP-1 agonists, and SGLT-2 inhibitors compared with other active treatments. Favors intervention (green) or favors comparator (red) indicates a statistically significant difference between the intervention and comparison or a meaningful difference in effect size (i.e., ≥25% increase or decrease) with 95% CIs not crossing both lower (0.75) and upper (1.25) bounds. Italicized interpretation text indicates statistically significant findings. Statistics are from the American College of Physicians–funded systematic review and network meta-analysis (24) available in Supplement Tables 1 to 4 (available at Annals.org). Interpretation of findings was done by the CGC. CGC = Clinical Guidelines Committee; CHF = congestive heart failure; CKD = chronic kidney disease; DPP-4 = dipeptidyl peptidase-4; GLP-1 = glucagon-like peptide-1; MACE = major adverse cardiovascular events; MI = myocardial infarction; SAE = serious adverse event; SGLT-2, sodium–glucose cotransporter-2. * SAEs were defined by investigators, varied, and were not always fully reported. In general, these SAEs included events considered fatal or life-threatening and incorporated events (e.g., stroke, MI) that could also be a clinical benefit (through a reduction) with type 2 diabetes treatment (24). Long-acting insulins and sulfonylureas directly cause hypoglycemia and were used either as a direct comparator or within usual care, which may distort findings.

Comment in

References

Web References

    1. American College of Physicians. Disclosure of interests and conflict of interest management summary for Clinical Guidelines Committee. 2023. Accessed at www.acponline.org/about-acp/who-we-are/leadership/boards-committees-coun... on 8 March 2024.
    1. Drummond MF, Jefferson TO; The BMJ Economic Evaluation Working Party. Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ. BMJ. 1996;313:275–283. doi:10.1136/bmj.313.7052.275 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aluko P, Graybill E, Craig D, et al. Economic evidence. In: Higgins J, Thomas J, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2022. Accessed at https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current/chapter-20 on 8 March 2024.
    1. U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Medicare Part D Spending by Drug. 2021. Accessed at https://data.cms.gov/summary-statistics-on-use-and-payments/medicare-med... on 8 March 2024.
    1. Bertram MY, Lauer JA, Stenberg K, et al. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care interventions for priority setting in the health system: an update from WHO CHOICE. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021;10:673–677. doi:10.34172/ijhpm.2020.244 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

References

    1. Stierman B, Afful J, Carroll MD, et al. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2017–March 2020 prepandemic data files development of files and prevalence estimates for selected health outcomes. Natl Health Stat Report. 14 June 2021. doi:10.15620/cdc:106273 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sun H, Saeedi P, Karuranga S, et al. IDF Diabetes Atlas: global, regional and country-level diabetes prevalence estimates for 2021 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2022;183:109119. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2021.109119 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Statistics Report. 2023. Accessed at www.cdc.gov/diabetes/data/statistics-report/index.html on 8 March 2024.
    1. Cavender MA, Steg PG, Smith SC, et al.; REACH Registry Investigators. Impact of diabetes mellitus on hospitalization for heart failure, cardiovascular events, and death: outcomes at 4 years from the Reduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health (REACH) registry. Circulation. 2015;132:923–931. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.014796 - DOI - PubMed
    1. American Diabetes Association. Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2017. Diabetes Care. 2018;41:917–928. doi:10.2337/dci18-0007 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms