Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Practice Guideline
. 2025 Jan;101(1):2-9.e1.
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.12.003. Epub 2024 Apr 17.

Consensus statements on the current landscape of artificial intelligence applications in endoscopy, addressing roadblocks, and advancing artificial intelligence in gastroenterology

Affiliations
Practice Guideline

Consensus statements on the current landscape of artificial intelligence applications in endoscopy, addressing roadblocks, and advancing artificial intelligence in gastroenterology

ASGE AI Task Force et al. Gastrointest Endosc. 2025 Jan.

Abstract

Background and aims: The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) AI Task Force along with experts in endoscopy, technology space, regulatory authorities, and other medical subspecialties initiated a consensus process that analyzed the current literature, highlighted potential areas, and outlined the necessary research in artificial intelligence (AI) to allow a clearer understanding of AI as it pertains to endoscopy currently.

Methods: A modified Delphi process was used to develop these consensus statements.

Results: Statement 1: Current advances in AI allow for the development of AI-based algorithms that can be applied to endoscopy to augment endoscopist performance in detection and characterization of endoscopic lesions. Statement 2: Computer vision-based algorithms provide opportunities to redefine quality metrics in endoscopy using AI, which can be standardized and can reduce subjectivity in reporting quality metrics. Natural language processing-based algorithms can help with the data abstraction needed for reporting current quality metrics in GI endoscopy effortlessly. Statement 3: AI technologies can support smart endoscopy suites, which may help optimize workflows in the endoscopy suite, including automated documentation. Statement 4: Using AI and machine learning helps in predictive modeling, diagnosis, and prognostication. High-quality data with multidimensionality are needed for risk prediction, prognostication of specific clinical conditions, and their outcomes when using machine learning methods. Statement 5: Big data and cloud-based tools can help advance clinical research in gastroenterology. Multimodal data are key to understanding the maximal extent of the disease state and unlocking treatment options. Statement 6: Understanding how to evaluate AI algorithms in the gastroenterology literature and clinical trials is important for gastroenterologists, trainees, and researchers, and hence education efforts by GI societies are needed. Statement 7: Several challenges regarding integrating AI solutions into the clinical practice of endoscopy exist, including understanding the role of human-AI interaction. Transparency, interpretability, and explainability of AI algorithms play a key role in their clinical adoption in GI endoscopy. Developing appropriate AI governance, data procurement, and tools needed for the AI lifecycle are critical for the successful implementation of AI into clinical practice. Statement 8: For payment of AI in endoscopy, a thorough evaluation of the potential value proposition for AI systems may help guide purchasing decisions in endoscopy. Reliable cost-effectiveness studies to guide reimbursement are needed. Statement 9: Relevant clinical outcomes and performance metrics for AI in gastroenterology are currently not well defined. To improve the quality and interpretability of research in the field, steps need to be taken to define these evidence standards. Statement 10: A balanced view of AI technologies and active collaboration between the medical technology industry, computer scientists, gastroenterologists, and researchers are critical for the meaningful advancement of AI in gastroenterology.

Conclusions: The consensus process led by the ASGE AI Task Force and experts from various disciplines has shed light on the potential of AI in endoscopy and gastroenterology. AI-based algorithms have shown promise in augmenting endoscopist performance, redefining quality metrics, optimizing workflows, and aiding in predictive modeling and diagnosis. However, challenges remain in evaluating AI algorithms, ensuring transparency and interpretability, addressing governance and data procurement, determining payment models, defining relevant clinical outcomes, and fostering collaboration between stakeholders. Addressing these challenges while maintaining a balanced perspective is crucial for the meaningful advancement of AI in gastroenterology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure The following authors disclosed financial relationships: S. Parasa: Consultant for Medtronic and Microsoft Research; advisory board for the Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence and Fujifilm; research support from Fujifilm. T. Berzin: Consultant for Medtronic, Wision AI, Magentiq Eye, RSIP Vision, and Docbot AI. C. Leggett: Consultant for Verily Life Sciences. S. Gross: Consultant for Medtronic and Iterative Scopes. A. Repici: Research support from Fujifilm, Boston Scientific Corporation, and Norgine; speaker for Boston Scientific Corporation and Norgine. O. F. Ahmad: Speaker for Olympus Corporation and Medtronic. A. Chiang: Employee at Medtronic. N. Coelho-Prabhu: Scientific advisory board for Iterative Health. J. Cohen: Consultant for Olympus and Micro-Tech; stock in GI Windows, Virtual Health Partners, and Rom-Tech; owner of MD Medical Navigators. E. Dekker: Research support from Fujifilm; consultant for Fujifilm, Olympus, Ambu, and InterVenn; speaker for Olympus, Fujifilm, GI Supply, IPSEN, PAION, and Norgine. R. N. Keswani: Consultant for Boston Scientific Corporation and Medtronic. C. E. Kahn: Travel compensation from Sectra USA; advisory council for Epic Corporation. C. Hassan: Consultant for Odin, Fujifilm, Olympus, and NEC. P. Mountney: Employment relationship with Odin Medical Limited and Olympus Medical. J. Ng: Chief executive officer and founder of Iterative Health. Y. Mori: Consultant for Olympus; speaker for Olympus; device loan from Olympus; royalties from Cybernet System. S. Thakkar: Consultant for Boston Scientific Corporation and Medtronic; advisor for Iterative Scopes. I. Waxman: Consultant for Medtronic, BSCI, and Cook Medical; advisory board for Magentiq Eye. M. B. Wallace: Consultant for Boston Scientific Corporation, Cosmo/Aries Pharmaceuticals, Verily, Endiatix, Intervenn, AlphaMed UAE, Fujifilm, and ClearNote; research support from Cosmo/Aries Pharmaceuticals and Boston Scientific Corporation; independent contractor for Olympus, Medtronic, and Ninepoint Medical; stock in Virgo Inc. P. Sharma: Consultant for Bausch, Boston Scientific Corporation, CDx Labs, Covidien LP, Exact Sciences, Fujifilm Medical Systems USA, Inc, Lucid, Lumendi, Medtronic, Olympus America, Inc, and Salix; research support from Cosmo Pharmaceuticals, Covidien, Docbot, Erbe USA Inc, Fujifilm Holdings America Corporation, Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Medtronic USA, Inc, Olympus, Salix, and US Endoscopy. All other authors disclosed no financial relationships.

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources