Diagnosis and Management of Macrosomia and Shoulder Dystocia: A Comprehensive Review of Major Guidelines
- PMID: 38640129
- DOI: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000001253
Diagnosis and Management of Macrosomia and Shoulder Dystocia: A Comprehensive Review of Major Guidelines
Abstract
Importance: Macrosomia represents the most significant risk factor of shoulder dystocia (SD), which is a severe and emergent complication of vaginal delivery. They are both associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes.
Objective: The aim of this study was to review and compare the most recently published influential guidelines on the diagnosis and management of fetal macrosomia and SD.
Evidence acquisition: A comparative review of guidelines from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG), and the Department for Health and Wellbeing of the Government of South Australia on macrosomia and SD was conducted.
Results: The ACOG and RANZCOG agree that macrosomia should be defined as birthweight above 4000-4500 g regardless of the gestational age, whereas the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence defines macrosomia as an estimated fetal weight above the 95th percentile. According to ACOG and RANZCOG, ultrasound scans and clinical estimates can be used to rule out fetal macrosomia, although lacking accuracy. Routine induction of labor before 39 weeks of gestation with the sole indication of suspected fetal macrosomia is unanimously not recommended, but an individualized counseling should be provided. Exercise, appropriate diet, and prepregnancy bariatric surgery are mentioned as preventive measures. There is also consensus among the reviewed guidelines regarding the definition and the diagnosis of SD, with the "turtle sign" being the most common sign for its recognition as well as the poor predictability of the reported risk factors. Moreover, there is an overall agreement on the algorithm of SD management with McRoberts technique suggested as first-line maneuver. In addition, appropriate staff training, thorough documentation, and time keeping are crucial aspects of SD management according to all medical societies. Elective delivery for the prevention of SD is discouraged by all the reviewed guidelines.
Conclusions: Macrosomia is associated not only with SD but also with maternal and neonatal complications. Similarly, SD can lead to permanent neurologic sequalae, as well as perinatal death if managed in a suboptimal way. Therefore, it is crucial to develop consistent international practice protocols for their prompt diagnosis and effective management in order to safely guide clinical practice and improve pregnancy outcomes.
Similar articles
-
Shoulder dystocia: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF).Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Aug;203:156-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.05.047. Epub 2016 May 30. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016. PMID: 27318182 Review.
-
[Delivery management for the prevention of shoulder dystocia in case of identified risk factors].J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2015 Dec;44(10):1261-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2015.09.051. Epub 2015 Nov 1. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2015. PMID: 26530180 Review. French.
-
[Shoulder dystocia: Guidelines for clinical practice--Short text].J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2015 Dec;44(10):1303-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2015.09.053. Epub 2015 Nov 2. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2015. PMID: 26541561 Review. French.
-
Shoulder dystocia: comparison of the ACOG practice bulletin with another national guideline.Am J Perinatol. 2010 Feb;27(2):129-36. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1224864. Epub 2009 Jun 29. Am J Perinatol. 2010. PMID: 19565435
-
[In case of fetal macrosomia, the best strategy is the induction of labor at 38 weeks of gestation].J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2016 Nov;45(9):1037-1044. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2016.09.001. Epub 2016 Oct 19. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2016. PMID: 27771202 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Clinical Significance of Pregnancies with Macrosomia (Birth Weight ≥ 4,000 g) Compared with Deliveries with Neonatal Birth Weight of 3,500-3,999 g.JMA J. 2025 Jan 15;8(1):249-254. doi: 10.31662/jmaj.2024-0117. Epub 2024 Dec 20. JMA J. 2025. PMID: 39926101 Free PMC article.
-
The threshold effect of fasting blood glucose levels on the risk of delivering macrosomia in gestational diabetes mellitus patients.Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 May 29;16:1587306. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1587306. eCollection 2025. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025. PMID: 40510470 Free PMC article.
-
CHAF1A Promotes Preadipocyte Differentiation and Contributes to Macrosomia in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.Reprod Sci. 2025 Aug 12. doi: 10.1007/s43032-025-01946-z. Online ahead of print. Reprod Sci. 2025. PMID: 40797060
-
Shoulder dystocia-Still a feared complication. How can we improve?Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024 Oct;103(10):1908-1909. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14952. Epub 2024 Aug 22. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024. PMID: 39171555 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources