Malpractice Claims Following Major Liver and Pancreatic Surgeries: What Can we Learn?
- PMID: 38640614
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.03.026
Malpractice Claims Following Major Liver and Pancreatic Surgeries: What Can we Learn?
Abstract
Introduction: General surgery is a highly litigious specialty. Lawsuits can be a source of emotional distress and burnout for surgeons. Major hepatic and pancreatic surgeries are technically challenging general surgical oncology procedures associated with an increased risk of complications and mortality. It is unclear whether these operations are associated with an increased risk of lawsuits. The objective of the present study was to summarize the medical malpractice claims surrounding pancreatic and hepatic surgeries from publicly available court records.
Methods: The Westlaw legal database was searched and analyzed for relevant malpractice claims from the last two decades.
Results: Of 165 search results, 30 (18.2%) cases were eligible for inclusion. Appellant cases comprised 53.3% of them. Half involved a patient death. Including co-defendants, a majority (n = 21, 70%) named surgeons as defendants, whereas several claims (n = 13, 43%) also named non-surgeons. The most common cause of alleged malpractice was a delay in diagnosis (n = 12, 40%). In eight of these, surgery could not be performed. The second most common were claims alleging the follow-up surgery was due to negligence (n = 6). Collectively, 20 claims were found in favor of the defendant. Seven verdicts (23.3%) returned in favor of the plaintiff, two of which resulted in monetary awards (totaling $1,608,325 and $424,933.85). Three cases went to trial or delayed motion for summary judgment. There were no settlements.
Conclusions: A defendant verdict was reached in two-thirds of malpractice cases involving major hepatic or pancreatic surgery. A delay in diagnosis was the most cited claim in hepatopancreaticobiliary lawsuits, and defendants may often practice in nonsurgical specialties. While rulings favoring plaintiffs are less frequent, the payouts may be substantial.
Keywords: Complications; Hepatopancreaticobiliary; Liver; Medical malpractice; Pancreas; Surgical oncology.
Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Delayed Diagnosis Is the Primary Cause of Sarcoma Litigation: Analysis of Malpractice Claims in the United States.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Oct;478(10):2239-2253. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001340. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020. PMID: 32496320 Free PMC article.
-
Malpractice litigation following spine surgery.J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Oct;27(4):470-475. doi: 10.3171/2016.11.SPINE16646. Epub 2017 Jul 21. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017. PMID: 28731391
-
Malpractice litigation in elective lumbar spinal fusion: a comprehensive review of reported legal claims in the U.S. in the past 50 years.Spine J. 2022 Aug;22(8):1254-1264. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.03.015. Epub 2022 Apr 3. Spine J. 2022. PMID: 35381361 Review.
-
Litigation Following Carpal Tunnel Release.Hand (N Y). 2019 Jul;14(4):466-470. doi: 10.1177/1558944718760032. Epub 2018 Mar 13. Hand (N Y). 2019. PMID: 29529876 Free PMC article.
-
Medical Malpractice in Pediatric Orthopaedics: A Systematic Review of US Case Law.J Pediatr Orthop. 2019 Jul;39(6):e482-e486. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001348. J Pediatr Orthop. 2019. PMID: 30730444
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources