Authors' Reply
- PMID: 38641049
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2024.04.008
Authors' Reply
Similar articles
-
Aberrations of an IR chopping secondary: authors' reply to comment 2 and continuation of authors' reply to comment 1.Appl Opt. 1985 Apr 1;24(7):944. doi: 10.1364/AO.24.000944. Appl Opt. 1985. PMID: 20436652 No abstract available.
-
Authors' reply: Comment on authors' reply: Patients' perception of risk: informed choice in prenatal testing for foetal aneuploidy.Singapore Med J. 2013 Apr;54(4):238. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2013084. Singapore Med J. 2013. PMID: 23624457 No abstract available.
-
Authors' Reply.J Mol Diagn. 2018 Mar;20(2):266. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2017.12.001. J Mol Diagn. 2018. PMID: 29482771
-
Authors' Reply on: FOCUS more on POCUS.Indian J Crit Care Med. 2023 Mar;27(3):226-227. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24428. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2023. PMID: 36960115 Free PMC article.
-
Authors' Reply.J Mol Diagn. 2018 Jan;20(1):125-126. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2017.11.002. J Mol Diagn. 2018. PMID: 29249244 Free PMC article.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources