The true complexities of "standard" family practice visits unmasked: an observational cross-sectional study in Regina
- PMID: 38641556
- PMCID: PMC11461146
- DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmae022
The true complexities of "standard" family practice visits unmasked: an observational cross-sectional study in Regina
Abstract
Background: Many patients present to their family medicine clinic with more than one health concern, placing an increased demand on family physicians. Research into the average number of concerns per regular family medicine visit is limited. Recognition of the frequency that family physicians address more than one concern per visit and adapting practices accordingly is important for improving patient care.
Objective: To examine whether family physicians routinely address multiple different patient concerns during a single visit and if this is influenced by patient demographics.
Methods: This study was conducted at a multi-physician family medicine clinic in Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada. Five physicians contributed their 500 most recent charts, extending retrospectively from 1 June 2023, from in-person visits by patients over 18 years of age and billed as regular appointments without billed procedures. Each chart was reviewed for the number of concerns addressed in the visit.
Results: Fifty percent of visits addressed more than 1 concern (range = 1-8). A generalized linear mixed model using Poisson distribution showed certain physicians (incident rate ratio [IRR]: 1.192, 95% CI: 1.087-1.307, P < 0.001) and adults older than 65 years compared to adults less than 40 years (IRR 1.151, 95% CI: 1.069-1.239, P < 0.001) were more likely to present with multiple concerns, but patient sex was not a significant predictor.
Conclusions: Family physicians routinely address more than one concern per visit. Standard visit length and billing practices should be adapted to reflect this complexity.
Keywords: access to care; compensation; electronic medical records; medical home/patient-centred medical home; primary care; quality of care.
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.
Conflict of interest statement
A potential conflict of interest is the use of clinical encounter notes from 2 of the authors’ clinical practices to keep the analysis within a single multidisciplinary clinic and have a variance of physician characteristics and practice experience. Data analysis was not completed by these physicians.
Similar articles
-
The Full Scope of Family Physicians' Work Is Not Reflected by Current Procedural Terminology Codes.J Am Board Fam Med. 2017 Nov-Dec;30(6):724-732. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2017.06.170155. J Am Board Fam Med. 2017. PMID: 29180547
-
Recording blood pressure readings in elderly patients' charts: what patient and physician characteristics make it more likely?Can Fam Physician. 2008 Feb;54(2):230-1. Can Fam Physician. 2008. PMID: 18272639 Free PMC article.
-
Factors influencing the frequency of visits by hypertensive patients to primary care physicians in Winnipeg.CMAJ. 1998 Oct 6;159(7):777-83. CMAJ. 1998. PMID: 9805023 Free PMC article.
-
Best practice: quality assessment outcomes of the Practice Enhancement Program among family physicians in Saskatchewan, Canada.Int J Qual Health Care. 2024 Jan 17;36(1):mzad108. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzad108. Int J Qual Health Care. 2024. PMID: 38155607
-
The association between health information technology adoption and family physicians' practice patterns in Canada: evidence from 2007 and 2010 National Physician Surveys.Healthc Policy. 2013 Aug;9(1):89-90. Healthc Policy. 2013. PMID: 23968677 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Flocke SA, Frank SH, Wenger DA.. Addressing multiple problems in the family practice office visit. J Fam Pract. 2001:50(3):211–216. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources