Prognostic performance of MRI LI-RADS version 2018 features and clinical-pathological factors in alpha-fetoprotein-negative hepatocellular carcinoma
- PMID: 38642093
- DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04278-9
Prognostic performance of MRI LI-RADS version 2018 features and clinical-pathological factors in alpha-fetoprotein-negative hepatocellular carcinoma
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the role of the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) version 2018 features and clinical-pathological factors for predicting the prognosis of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP)-negative (≤ 20 ng/ml) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients, and to compare with other traditional staging systems.
Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 169 patients with AFP-negative HCC who received preoperative MRI and hepatectomy between January 2015 and August 2020 (derivation dataset:validation dataset = 118:51). A prognostic model was constructed using the risk factors identified via Cox regression analysis. Predictive performance and discrimination capability were evaluated and compared with those of two traditional staging systems.
Results: Six risk factors, namely the LI-RADS category, blood products in mass, microvascular invasion, tumor size, cirrhosis, and albumin-bilirubin grade, were associated with recurrence-free survival. The prognostic model constructed using these factors achieved C-index of 0.705 and 0.674 in the derivation and validation datasets, respectively. Furthermore, the model performed better in predicting patient prognosis than traditional staging systems. The model effectively stratified patients with AFP-negative HCC into high- and low-risk groups with significantly different outcomes (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: A prognostic model integrating the LI-RADS category, blood products in mass, microvascular invasion, tumor size, cirrhosis, and albumin-bilirubin grade may serve as a valuable tool for refining risk stratification in patients with AFP-negative HCC.
Keywords: Alpha-fetoprotein; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Magnetic resonance imaging; Nomogram; Prognosis.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Preoperative and postoperative MRI-based models versus clinical staging systems for predicting early recurrence in hepatocellular carcinoma.Eur J Surg Oncol. 2024 Sep;50(9):108476. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108476. Epub 2024 Jun 8. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38870875
-
Risk stratification of solitary hepatocellular carcinoma ≤ 5 cm without microvascular invasion: prognostic values of MR imaging features based on LI-RADS and clinical parameters.Eur Radiol. 2023 May;33(5):3592-3603. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09484-5. Epub 2023 Mar 8. Eur Radiol. 2023. PMID: 36884087
-
Comparison of a preoperative MR-based recurrence risk score versus the postoperative score and four clinical staging systems in hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.Eur Radiol. 2022 Nov;32(11):7578-7589. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08811-6. Epub 2022 May 13. Eur Radiol. 2022. PMID: 35554652 Free PMC article.
-
Imaging Prognostic Biomarkers in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Review.Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2024 Dec;45(6):454-463. doi: 10.1053/j.sult.2024.07.009. Epub 2024 Jul 26. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2024. PMID: 39067621 Review.
-
MRI Imaging Biomarkers for Prognostication of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.J Korean Soc Radiol. 2025 May;86(3):364-380. doi: 10.3348/jksr.2025.0029. Epub 2025 May 28. J Korean Soc Radiol. 2025. PMID: 40502476 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- 2018 EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Journal of Hepatology 69:182–236
-
- Petrowsky H, Fritsch R, Guckenberger M, De Oliveira ML, Dutkowski P, Clavien PA (2020) Modern therapeutic approaches for the treatment of malignant liver tumours. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology 17:755-772 - DOI
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical