Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul;50(7):480-491.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.03.003. Epub 2024 Mar 12.

Frontline Providers' and Patients' Perspectives on Improving Diagnostic Safety in the Emergency Department: A Qualitative Study

Frontline Providers' and Patients' Perspectives on Improving Diagnostic Safety in the Emergency Department: A Qualitative Study

Courtney W Mangus et al. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2024 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Few studies have described the insights of frontline health care providers and patients on how the diagnostic process can be improved in the emergency department (ED), a setting at high risk for diagnostic errors. The authors aimed to identify the perspectives of providers and patients on the diagnostic process and identify potential interventions to improve diagnostic safety.

Methods: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 10 ED physicians, 15 ED nurses, and 9 patients/caregivers at two separate health systems. Interview questions were guided by the ED-Adapted National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine Diagnostic Process Framework and explored participant perspectives on the ED diagnostic process, identified vulnerabilities, and solicited interventions to improve diagnostic safety. The authors performed qualitative thematic analysis on transcribed interviews.

Results: The research team categorized vulnerabilities in the diagnostic process and intervention opportunities based on the ED-Adapted Framework into five domains: (1) team dynamics and communication (for example, suboptimal communication between referring physicians and the ED team); (2) information gathering related to patient presentation (for example, obtaining the history from the patients or their caregivers; (3) ED organization, system, and processes (for example, staff schedules and handoffs); (4) patient education and self-management (for example, patient education at discharge from the ED); and (5) electronic health record and patient portal use (for example, automatic release of test results into the patient portal). The authors identified 33 potential interventions, of which 17 were provider focused and 16 were patient focused.

Conclusion: Frontline providers and patients identified several vulnerabilities and potential interventions to improve ED diagnostic safety. Refining, implementing, and evaluating the efficacy of these interventions are required.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest. All authors report no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
This diagram illustrates the Emergency Department (ED)–Adapted Diagnostic Process Framework, modified to include a sample of interview themes (bold text) and sample interview questions. Provider (physician/nurse) questions are shown in blue type, and patient questions are shown in green type. EMS, emergency medical services.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Improving Diagnosis in Health Care, Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2015. Accessed Mar 21, 2024 https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/21794/improving-diagnosis-in-h... .
    1. Singh H, Meyer AND, Thomas EJ. The frequency of diagnostic errors in outpatient care: estimations from three large observational studies involving US adult populations. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014;23:727–731. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Singh H, Graber ML. Improving diagnosis in health care—the next imperative for patient safety. N Engl J Med. 2015. Dec 24;373:2493–2495. - PubMed
    1. Graber ML. The incidence of diagnostic error in medicine. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22(Suppl 2):ii21–ii27. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bishop TF, Ryan AM, Casalino LP. Paid malpractice claims for adverse events in inpatient and outpatient settings. JAMA. 2011. Jun 15;305:2427–2431. - PubMed

Publication types