Frontline Providers' and Patients' Perspectives on Improving Diagnostic Safety in the Emergency Department: A Qualitative Study
- PMID: 38643047
- PMCID: PMC11473193
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.03.003
Frontline Providers' and Patients' Perspectives on Improving Diagnostic Safety in the Emergency Department: A Qualitative Study
Abstract
Background: Few studies have described the insights of frontline health care providers and patients on how the diagnostic process can be improved in the emergency department (ED), a setting at high risk for diagnostic errors. The authors aimed to identify the perspectives of providers and patients on the diagnostic process and identify potential interventions to improve diagnostic safety.
Methods: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 10 ED physicians, 15 ED nurses, and 9 patients/caregivers at two separate health systems. Interview questions were guided by the ED-Adapted National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine Diagnostic Process Framework and explored participant perspectives on the ED diagnostic process, identified vulnerabilities, and solicited interventions to improve diagnostic safety. The authors performed qualitative thematic analysis on transcribed interviews.
Results: The research team categorized vulnerabilities in the diagnostic process and intervention opportunities based on the ED-Adapted Framework into five domains: (1) team dynamics and communication (for example, suboptimal communication between referring physicians and the ED team); (2) information gathering related to patient presentation (for example, obtaining the history from the patients or their caregivers; (3) ED organization, system, and processes (for example, staff schedules and handoffs); (4) patient education and self-management (for example, patient education at discharge from the ED); and (5) electronic health record and patient portal use (for example, automatic release of test results into the patient portal). The authors identified 33 potential interventions, of which 17 were provider focused and 16 were patient focused.
Conclusion: Frontline providers and patients identified several vulnerabilities and potential interventions to improve ED diagnostic safety. Refining, implementing, and evaluating the efficacy of these interventions are required.
Copyright © 2024 The Joint Commission. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures

Comment in
-
The Quest for Diagnostic Excellence in the Emergency Department.Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2024 Jul;50(7):475-477. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.05.004. Epub 2024 May 8. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2024. PMID: 38824059 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Refining a Framework to Enhance Communication in the Emergency Department During the Diagnostic Process: An eDelphi Approach.Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2024 May;50(5):348-356. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.01.013. Epub 2024 Jan 30. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2024. PMID: 38423950
-
Identifying Interventions to Improve Diagnostic Safety in Emergency Departments: Protocol for a Participatory Design Study.JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Jun 21;13:e55357. doi: 10.2196/55357. JMIR Res Protoc. 2024. PMID: 38904990 Free PMC article.
-
Designing Health Care Provider-Centered Emergency Department Interventions: Participatory Design Study.JMIR Form Res. 2025 Apr 21;9:e68891. doi: 10.2196/68891. JMIR Form Res. 2025. PMID: 40258269 Free PMC article.
-
What interventions could reduce diagnostic error in emergency departments? A review of evidence, practice and consumer perspectives.Diagnosis (Berl). 2019 Nov 26;6(4):325-334. doi: 10.1515/dx-2018-0104. Diagnosis (Berl). 2019. PMID: 31116702
-
Leveraging artificial intelligence to reduce diagnostic errors in emergency medicine: Challenges, opportunities, and future directions.Acad Emerg Med. 2025 Mar;32(3):327-339. doi: 10.1111/acem.15066. Epub 2024 Dec 15. Acad Emerg Med. 2025. PMID: 39676165 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
"Everything is electronic health record-driven": the role of the electronic health record in the emergency department diagnostic process.JAMIA Open. 2025 Apr 23;8(2):ooaf029. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf029. eCollection 2025 Apr. JAMIA Open. 2025. PMID: 40270489 Free PMC article.
-
Online public response to emergency department diagnostic error report: A qualitative study.Acad Emerg Med. 2025 Mar;32(3):300-308. doi: 10.1111/acem.15047. Epub 2024 Nov 12. Acad Emerg Med. 2025. PMID: 39530250 Free PMC article.
-
Health provider perspectives on differentiated service delivery for HIV in Oyo state, Nigeria: exploring the experiences of service providers from a demand perspective.BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Aug 21;25(1):1119. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13283-7. BMC Health Serv Res. 2025. PMID: 40836340 Free PMC article.
-
Aortic dissection in the ED: a medico-legal perspective on diagnostic delays and failures.CJEM. 2025 Aug 21. doi: 10.1007/s43678-025-00999-y. Online ahead of print. CJEM. 2025. PMID: 40841784
References
-
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Improving Diagnosis in Health Care, Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2015. Accessed Mar 21, 2024 https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/21794/improving-diagnosis-in-h... .
-
- Singh H, Graber ML. Improving diagnosis in health care—the next imperative for patient safety. N Engl J Med. 2015. Dec 24;373:2493–2495. - PubMed
-
- Bishop TF, Ryan AM, Casalino LP. Paid malpractice claims for adverse events in inpatient and outpatient settings. JAMA. 2011. Jun 15;305:2427–2431. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical