Cephalometric changes associated with treatment using the activator, the Fränkel appliance, and the fixed appliance
- PMID: 3864370
- DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(85)90063-6
Cephalometric changes associated with treatment using the activator, the Fränkel appliance, and the fixed appliance
Abstract
Treatment with the activator, the Fränkel appliance, and the edgewise appliance was compared in three separate groups; each group consisted of twenty-five nonextraction cases of Class II, Division 1 malocclusion. Hard- and soft-tissue profile changes caused by growth and treatment were assessed by means of pretreatment and posttreatment lateral cephalograms. Anterior movement of A point was 1.6 mm more in the activator group than in the fixed-appliance group. The most anterior point on the maxillary incisor moved 1.5 mm more distally in the fixed-appliance sample than in the functional groups. Among the three groups, the activator sample showed the most anterior movement of the mandible (2.3 mm); the fixed group showed the least (0.6 mm). The fixed-appliance group showed more posterior rotation of the mandible than the activator group. However, relative to cranial base, the movement of the mandibular symphysis was not statistically different in the three groups. There were little differences among the treatment groups with regard to changes in the soft-tissue profile. In clinical terms, there was a remarkable similarity in the changes that occurred in the three treatment groups.
Similar articles
-
A comparison of Class II treatment changes noted with the light wire, edgewise, and Fränkel appliances.Am J Orthod. 1984 Oct;86(4):269-76. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(84)90137-4. Am J Orthod. 1984. PMID: 6592975
-
Class II, division 1 treatment with Fränkel and Edgewise appliances--a comparative study of mandibular growth and facial esthetics.Angle Orthod. 1985 Oct;55(4):281-98. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1985)055<0281:CIDTWF>2.0.CO;2. Angle Orthod. 1985. PMID: 3865566
-
The relationship between hard and soft tissue changes following treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions using Edgewise and Fränkel appliance techniques.Eur J Orthod. 1990 May;12(2):154-65. doi: 10.1093/ejo/12.2.154. Eur J Orthod. 1990. PMID: 2351200
-
Morphologic changes in the sagittal dimension using the Fränkel appliance.Am J Orthod. 1981 Dec;80(6):573-603. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(81)90263-3. Am J Orthod. 1981. PMID: 6947692
-
Lower incisor position in treatment planning.Br J Orthod. 1986 Jan;13(1):33-41. doi: 10.1179/bjo.13.1.33. Br J Orthod. 1986. PMID: 3510663 Review.
Cited by
-
Cranial base and maxillary changes in patients treated with Frankel' s functional regulator (1b).Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012 Jul 1;17(4):e689-96. doi: 10.4317/medoral.17631. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012. PMID: 22322486 Free PMC article.
-
[Morphologic criteria of indications in treatment using Ascher's bionator modification].Fortschr Kieferorthop. 1987 Apr;48(2):71-86. doi: 10.1007/BF02175610. Fortschr Kieferorthop. 1987. PMID: 3474201 German. No abstract available.
-
Long-term treatment effects of the FR-2 appliance: a prospective evalution 7 years post-treatment.Eur J Orthod. 2014 Apr;36(2):192-9. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjt026. Epub 2013 Jun 4. Eur J Orthod. 2014. PMID: 23736378 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Facial profile and dental changes before, during and after treatment with Hansaplate/Headgear.J Orofac Orthop. 2000;61(1):34-44. doi: 10.1007/BF02340930. J Orofac Orthop. 2000. PMID: 10682409 Clinical Trial. English, German.
-
Stepwise versus single-step mandibular advancement with functional appliance in treating class II patients : A meta-analysis.J Orofac Orthop. 2020 Sep;81(5):311-327. doi: 10.1007/s00056-020-00229-3. Epub 2020 May 15. J Orofac Orthop. 2020. PMID: 32415333 Review. English.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Other Literature Sources