A novel questionnaire for evaluating digital tool use (DTUQ-D) among individuals with type 2 diabetes: exploring the digital landscape
- PMID: 38645461
- PMCID: PMC11026855
- DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1374848
A novel questionnaire for evaluating digital tool use (DTUQ-D) among individuals with type 2 diabetes: exploring the digital landscape
Abstract
Introduction: Effective healthcare currently incorporates a patient-centric system and accessible technology for patient self-management. This study aimed to develop and validate a novel questionnaire titled the Digital Tool Use Questionnaire for Diabetes (DTUQ-D) - a screening tool identifying the type, number, and frequency of digital tools used by Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) patients with within HMOs, online, and via applications.
Methods: The questionnaire was administered to two ethnic groups and both genders. A mixed-methods approach was used. In the qualitative phase, the questionnaire was developed through phone surveys of 29 T2DM patients, two endocrinologists and two technology experts. In the quantitative phase, involving 367 participants, convergent validity, construct validity, and reliability were examined.
Results: Findings indicated that the DTUQ-D is valid and reliable, successfully identifying digital tools utilized by T2DM patients, notwithstanding variations in factor structures between ethnic groups. This questionnaire provides a foundation for future research, offering a standardized approach to evaluating digital tool usage.
Discussion: The study enhances understanding of the role of digital tools in healthcare, especially for T2DM self-management. It also can be easily adapted to assess digital tool use for other illnesses by adjusting instructions and the wording of certain items.
Keywords: DTUQ-D; digital tools; eHealth; questionnaire; type 2 diabetes.
Copyright © 2024 Peleg, Hadar and Boniel-Nissim.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The reviewer AT-S declared a shared affiliation with the authors to the handling editor at the time of review.
Similar articles
-
Development of a diabetes-related nutrition knowledge questionnaire for individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Singapore.Nutr Diet. 2019 Nov;76(5):567-573. doi: 10.1111/1747-0080.12513. Epub 2019 Jan 31. Nutr Diet. 2019. PMID: 30706657
-
Impact of hypoglycemic episodes on health-related quality of life of type-2 diabetes mellitus patients: development and validation of a specific QoLHYPO© questionnaire.Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Mar 23;16(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0875-1. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018. PMID: 29566707 Free PMC article.
-
Development and validation of the diabetic self-management scale based on information-motivation-behavioral skills theory.Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 24;11:1109158. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1109158. eCollection 2023. Front Public Health. 2023. PMID: 36908406 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Development and psychometric properties of a new social support scale for self-care in middle-aged patients with type II diabetes (S4-MAD).BMC Public Health. 2012 Nov 28;12:1035. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-1035. BMC Public Health. 2012. PMID: 23190685 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of Psychological Distress in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Through Technologies: Literature Review.J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 7;23(1):e17740. doi: 10.2196/17740. J Med Internet Res. 2021. PMID: 33410762 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- WHO . WHO guideline on health workforce development, attraction, recruitment and retention in rural and remote areas. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; (2021). - PubMed
-
- Tanaka J., Ohnishi M., Hamasaki M., Imoto Y., Matsuno A., Sakurai T., et al. . Association between eHealth literacy and health education experiences and confidence regarding online health information among nurses: A cross-sectional study. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing. (2023) 41, 861–868. doi: 10.1097/CIN.000000000000102 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical