Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 5:15:1280568.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1280568. eCollection 2024.

Word meaning types acquired before vs. after age 5: implications for education

Affiliations

Word meaning types acquired before vs. after age 5: implications for education

Andrew Biemiller. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

This article concerns two types of word meanings: nonverbal meanings which appear to be associated with neurological representations and verbally-based meanings which appear to depend in part on other words to construct meanings. Using word use data from Hart and Risley's study of children aged 19 to 36 months, and word meaning knowledge data from Biemiller and Slonim's studies of children between aged 5 to 11, meanings were classified as nonverbal or verbally-based. Biemiller and Slonim used sampled word meanings reported known from grade levels 2 to 12 reported by Dale and O'Rourke in their Living Word Vocabulary. Virtually all meanings used at age 3 or known at age 5 (preschool) were classified nonverbal. By grade two, and even more by grade five, children had added many verbally-defined meanings, although by grade five the majority of the word meanings known were still nonverbal. Evidence for neurological meaning associates are cited. Implications for vocabulary support and instruction at various ages suggest that for children under 6, supporting larger nonverbal vocabularies while after age 6 should prioritize verbally-defined meanings.

Keywords: abstract; children’s vocabulary; concrete; nonverbal; symbolic; verbally-defined.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Similar articles

References

    1. Biemiller A. (2005). “Size and sequence in vocabulary development: implications for choosing words for primary grade vocabulary instruction” in Teaching and learning vocabulary: Bringing research to practice. eds. Hiebert E. H., Kamil M. L. (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; ), 223–242.
    1. Biemiller A. (2010a). Words worth teaching. Columbus, OH: McGraw-Hill Book Co.
    1. Biemiller A. (2010b). “Vocabulary development and implications for reading problems” in Handbook of research on Reading disabilities. eds. McGill-Franzen A., Allington R. (New York, NY: Routledge; ), 208–218.
    1. Biemiller A., Boote C. (2006). An effective method for building meaning vocabulary in primary grades. J. Educ. Psychol. 98, 44–62. Not cited. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.44 - DOI
    1. Biemiller A., Rosenstein M., Sparks R., Landauer T. K., Foltz P. (2014). Models of vocabulary acquisition: direct tests and text-derived simulations of vocabulary growth. Sci. Stud. Read. 18, 130–154. doi: 10.1080/10888438.2013.821992 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources