Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2024 Apr 22:83:166-173.
doi: 10.2340/aos.v83.40255.

Comparison of the clinical efficacy of bone grafting and bone grafting combined with guided tissue regeneration in periodontal regenerative therapy: a meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Comparison of the clinical efficacy of bone grafting and bone grafting combined with guided tissue regeneration in periodontal regenerative therapy: a meta-analysis

Fengqi Zhang et al. Acta Odontol Scand. .

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to compare the clinical efficacy of simple bone grafting and bone grafting combined with guided tissue regeneration (GTR) in periodontal regenerative therapy.

Methods: The authors systematically searched PubMed, the Web of Science, The National Library of Medicine, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure database and the Wanfang database and collected randomized controlled trials relating to bone graft co-guided tissue regeneration. The retrieval was conducted between January 1990 and December 2022. This study included relevant literature about the clinical efficacy of bone grafting combined with GTR according to the population, intervention, control and outcomes principle and excluded studies using other materials in addition to bone graft and membrane materials. After independently screening the literature, extracting the data and evaluating the risk of bias in the included studies, data analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. Results: Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria, and, after further evaluation, a total of 327 teeth that were featured in 15 articles were finally included for meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed that there was no significant statistical difference in clinical attachment level, probing depth and bone gain between the test group (bone grafting with GTR) and the control group (bone grafting only) at 6 months after the operation (p > 0.05). In terms of gingival recession (GR), the use of non-resorbable membranes produced more recession in the test group compared with the control group (p < 0.05), whereas the use of resorbable membranes produced less recession (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Both simple bone grafting and bone grafting combined with membrane materials have good clinical efficacy in periodontal regenerative therapy, and no significant difference in clinical efficacy is indicated between the two, with the exception of GR.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Literature screening and flow chart.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Funnel plot of CAL 6 months post-op.

References

    1. Liccardo D, Cannavo A, Spagnuolo G, et al. . Periodontal disease: a risk factor for diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(6):1414. 10.3390/ijms20061414 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yan FH, Li LL. Development in periodontal re-generative treatment. J Oral Sci Res. 2018;34(3):217–22.
    1. Darby IB, Morris KH. A systematic review of the use of growth factors in human periodontal regeneration. J Periodontol. 2013;84(4):465–76. 10.1902/jop.2012.120145 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Reynolds MA, Aichelmann-Reidy ME, Branch-Mays GL, et al. . The efficacy of bone replacement grafts in the treatment of periodontal osseous defects. A systematic review. Ann Periodontol. 2003;8(1):227–65. 10.1902/annals.2003.8.1.227 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stoecklin-Wasmer C, Rutjes AWS, da Costa BR, et al. . Absorbable collagen membranes for periodontal regeneration: a systematic review. J Dent Res. 2013;92(9):773–81. 10.1177/0022034513496428 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources