Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec 19;9(1):130.
doi: 10.1186/s40643-022-00612-5.

Simultaneous photoautotrophic production of DHA and EPA by Tisochrysis lutea and Microchloropsis salina in co-culture

Affiliations

Simultaneous photoautotrophic production of DHA and EPA by Tisochrysis lutea and Microchloropsis salina in co-culture

Anna-Lena Thurn et al. Bioresour Bioprocess. .

Abstract

Marine microalgae have received much attention as a sustainable source of the two health beneficial omega-3-fatty acids docosahexaenoic acid (DHA, C22:6) and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA, C20:5). However, photoautotrophic monocultures of microalgae can only produce either DHA or EPA enriched biomass. An alternative may be the photoautotrophic co-cultivation of Tisochrysis lutea as DHA-producer with Microchloropsis salina for simultaneous EPA production to obtain EPA- and DHA-rich microalgae biomass in a nutritionally balanced ratio. Photoautotrophic co-cultivation processes of T. lutea and M. salina were studied, applying scalable and fully controlled lab-scale gas-lift flat-plate photobioreactors with LED illumination for dynamic climate simulation of a repeated sunny summer day in Australia [day-night cycles of incident light (PAR) and temperature]. Monocultures of both marine microalgae were used as reference batch processes. Differences in the autofluorescence of both microalgae enabled the individual measurement, of cell distributions in co-culture, by flow cytometry. The co-cultivation of T. lutea and M. salina in artificial sea water with an inoculation ratio of 1:3 resulted in a balanced biomass production of both microalgae simultaneously with a DHA:EPA ratio of almost 1:1 (26 mgDHA gCDW-1, and 23 mgEPA gCDW-1, respectively) at harvest after depletion of the initially added fertilizer. Surprisingly, more microalgae biomass was produced within 8 days in co-cultivation with an increase in the cell dry weight (CDW) concentration by 31%, compared to the monocultures with the same amount of light and fertilizer. What is more, DHA-content of the microalgae biomass was enhanced by 33% in the co-culture, whereas EPA-content remained unchanged compared to the monocultures.

Keywords: Microchloropsis salina; Tisochrysis lutea; Co-cultivation; Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA); Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA); Photoautotrophic microalgae.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Solar photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) and air temperature. Data recorded in Newcastle, Australia, on January 19, 2018 by BSRN station no: 52. Data were provided by Duck (2018) (BSRN). All batch processes in flat-plate gas-lift photobioreactors were performed under these repeatedly applied conditions
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Histograms of three samples with A 100% M. salina, B 100% T. lutea and C mixed sample containing both algal strains at an OD750 of 0.2. X-axis shows the intensity of the fluorescence signal excited by a red laser at 640 nm and detected using the 660/10 nm bandpass filter. Y-axis shows the cell counts of the algae strains
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Phototrophic batch processes with T. lutea (right, red circle) and M. salina (left, green circle) in flat-plate gas-lift photobioreactors under simulated climate conditions. A Cell dry weight concentration, B nitrate concentration, C DHA (red circle) or EPA (green circle) concentration, and D DHA (red circle) or EPA (green circle) content of total cell dry weight. The batch processes were operated at a working volume of 1.8 L, pH 8.0 and an initial nitrate supply of 1.8 g L−1. Monocultures were inoculated at an OD750 of 0.2
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Variation of inoculation ratios in phototrophic batch processes with T. lutea (red circle) and M. salina (green circle) in co-culture at constant light irradiance of 83 ± 17 µmol m−2 s−1 and a constant temperature of 25 °C in 200 mL bubble column reactors operated in parallel. A Inoculation ratio 1:1, B inoculation ratio 1:2, C inoculation ratio 1:3, D inoculation ratio 1:4 (T. lutea:M. salina). The batch processes were operated at a working volume of 200 mL and pH 8.0
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Phototrophic batch process with T. lutea (red circle) and M. salina (green circle) in co-culture with an inoculation ratio of 1:3 in flat-plate gas-lift photobioreactors under simulated climate conditions. A cell dry weight concentration of T. lutea, B cell dry weight concentration of M. salina, C total cell dry weight concentration, D nitrate concentration, E DHA concentration, F EPA concentration, G DHA content of total cell dry weight, H EPA content of total cell dry weight. The batch process was operated at a working volume of 1.8 L, pH 8.0 and an initial nitrate supply of 1.8 g L−1. Data are expressed as a mean ± SD (n = 3)
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
A Absorption spectra of monocultures of M. salina (green dashed lines) and T. lutea (red dashed lines) and of a co-culture (green dashed lines) of both microalgae after acid acetone extraction. B Absorption spectra of the pigments Chlorophyll a (dashed dots) and Fucoxanthin (dashed line) after acid acetone extraction

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Duck B (2018) Basic measurements of radiation at station Newcastle (2017–11) Retrieved from: 10.1594/PANGAEA.896530
    1. Adarme-Vega TC, Lim DKY, Timmins M, Vernen F, Li Y, Schenk PM. Microalgal biofactories: a promising approach towards sustainable omega-3 fatty acid production. Microb Cell Fact. 2012;11(1):96. doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-11-96. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aussant J, Guihéneuf F, Stengel DB. Impact of temperature on fatty acid composition and nutritional value in eight species of microalgae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018;102(12):5279–5297. doi: 10.1007/s00253-018-9001-x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barta DG, Coman V, Vodnar DC. Microalgae as sources of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids: biotechnological aspects. Algal Res. 2021;58:102410. doi: 10.1016/j.algal.2021.102410. - DOI
    1. Borowitzka MA. Commercial production of microalgae: ponds, tanks, tubes and fermenters. J Biotechnol. 1999;70(1):313–321. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1656(99)00083-8. - DOI