Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2024 Apr 22:13:e56262.
doi: 10.2196/56262.

TAILR (Nursing-Sensitive Events and Their Association With Individual Nurse Staffing Levels) Project: Protocol for an International Longitudinal Multicenter Study

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

TAILR (Nursing-Sensitive Events and Their Association With Individual Nurse Staffing Levels) Project: Protocol for an International Longitudinal Multicenter Study

Stefanie Bachnick et al. JMIR Res Protoc. .

Abstract

Background: Nursing-sensitive events (NSEs) are common, accounting for up to 77% of adverse events in hospitalized patients (eg, fall-related harm, pressure ulcers, and health care-associated infections). NSEs lead to adverse patient outcomes and impose an economic burden on hospitals due to increased medical costs through a prolonged hospital stay and additional medical procedures. To reduce NSEs and ensure high-quality nursing care, appropriate nurse staffing levels are needed. Although the link between nurse staffing and NSEs has been described in many studies, appropriate nurse staffing levels are lacking. Existing studies describe constant staffing exposure at the unit or hospital level without assessing patient-level exposure to nurse staffing during the hospital stay. Few studies have assessed nurse staffing and patient outcomes using a single-center longitudinal design, with limited generalizability. There is a need for multicenter longitudinal studies with improved potential for generalizing the association between individual nurse staffing levels and NSEs.

Objective: This study aimed (1) to determine the prevalence, preventability, type, and severity of NSEs; (2) to describe individual patient-level nurse staffing exposure across hospitals; (3) to assess the effect of nurse staffing on NSEs in patients; and (4) to identify thresholds of safe nurse staffing levels and test them against NSEs in hospitalized patients.

Methods: This international multicenter study uses a longitudinal and observational research design; it involves 4 countries (Switzerland, Sweden, Germany, and Iran), with participation from 14 hospitals and 61 medical, surgery, and mixed units. The 16-week observation period will collect NSEs using systematic retrospective record reviews. A total of 3680 patient admissions will be reviewed, with 60 randomly selected admissions per unit. To be included, patients must have been hospitalized for at least 48 hours. Nurse staffing data (ie, the number of nurses and their education level) will be collected daily for each shift to assess the association between NSEs and individual nurse staffing levels. Additionally, hospital data (ie, type, teaching status, and ownership) and unit data (ie, service line and number of beds) will be collected.

Results: As of January 2024, the verification process for the plausibility and comprehensibility of patients' and nurse staffing data is underway across all 4 countries. Data analyses are planned to be completed by spring 2024, with the first results expected to be published in late 2024.

Conclusions: This study will provide comprehensive information on NSEs, including their prevalence, preventability, type, and severity, across countries. Moreover, it seeks to enhance understanding of NSE mechanisms and the potential impact of nurse staffing on these events. We will evaluate within- and between-hospital variability to identify productive strategies to ensure safe nurse staffing levels, thereby reducing NSEs in hospitalized patients. The TAILR (Nursing-Sensitive Events and Their Association With Individual Nurse Staffing Levels) study will focus on the optimization of scarce staffing resources.

International registered report identifier (irrid): DERR1-10.2196/56262.

Keywords: adverse events; electronic health record; hospital care; no-harm incidents; nurse staffing; nursing care; nursing-sensitive events; patient safety; systematic record review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Directed acyclic graph of the staffing and nursing-sensitive events The graph describes a set of time-invariant individual-level confounders, such as age (A) or sex (C); time-variant confounders, such as patient severity on a given shift (L1…n); and the time-variant exposure variable of the observed-over-expected estimator for nurse staffing (A1…n). The minimal adjustment set also includes the admission reason (AR), which determines the unit to which a patient is admitted. Y: outcome.

References

    1. D'Amour D, Dubois C, Tchouaket. Clarke S, Blais R. The occurrence of adverse events potentially attributable to nursing care in medical units: cross sectional record review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2014 Jun;51(6):882–91. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.10.017.S0020-7489(13)00325-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grube J. National voluntary consensus standards for hospital care: an initial performance measure set. JHQ. 2004;26(4):58–59. doi: 10.1097/01445442-200407000-00013. - DOI
    1. Needleman J, Buerhaus P, Mattke S, Stewart M, Zelevinsky K. Nurse-staffing levels and the quality of care in hospitals. N Engl J Med. 2002 May 30;346(22):1715–1722. doi: 10.1056/nejmsa012247. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Griffin FA, Resar RK. IHI Global Trigger Tool for Measuring Adverse Events (Second Edition) Cambridge, Massachusetts: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2009. pp. 1–42.
    1. Hommel A, Magnéli M, Samuelsson B, Schildmeijer K, Sjöstrand D, Göransson KE, Unbeck M. Exploring the incidence and nature of nursing-sensitive orthopaedic adverse events: a multicenter cohort study using Global Trigger Tool. Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Feb;102:103473. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103473. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0020-7489(19)30280-9 S0020-7489(19)30280-9 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms