Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct 29;8(3):BJGPO.2024.0073.
doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0073. Print 2024 Oct.

Impact of research activity on performance of general practices: a qualitative study

Cassandra Kenning  1 , Juliet A Usher-Smith  2 , James Jamison  3 , Jennifer Jones  4 , Annette Boaz  5 , Paul Little  6 , Christian Mallen  7 , Peter Bower  8 , Sophie Park  9
Affiliations

Impact of research activity on performance of general practices: a qualitative study

Cassandra Kenning et al. BJGP Open. .

Abstract

Background: There is evidence that engaging in research is directly associated with better performance. If this relationship is to be strengthened, it is necessary to understand the mechanisms that might underlie that relationship.

Aim: To explore the perspectives of staff and wider stakeholders about mechanisms by which research activity may impact on the performance of general practices.

Design & setting: Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with general practice professionals and wider stakeholders in England.

Method: Individual interviews with 41 purposively sampled staff in 'research-ready' or 'research-active' general practices, and 21 other stakeholders. Interviews were independently coded by three researchers using a framework approach.

Results: Participants described potential 'direct' and 'indirect' impacts on their work. 'Direct' impacts included improved knowledge and skills that could change practice work (for example, additional records searches for particular conditions); bringing in additional resources (for example, access to investigations or staff); and improving relationships with patients. 'Indirect' impacts included job satisfaction (for example, perception of practice as a centre of excellence and innovation, and the variety afforded by research activity reducing burnout); and staff recruitment (increasing the attractiveness of the practice as a place to work). Responders identified few negative impacts.

Conclusion: Staff and stakeholders identified a range of potential impacts of research activity on practice performance, with impacts on their working lives most salient. Negative impacts were not generally raised. Nevertheless, responders generally discussed potential impacts rather than providing specific examples of those impacts. This may reflect the type of research activity conducted in general practice, often led by external collaborators.

Keywords: general practice; qualitative research; research; research activity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Mechanisms linking research activity and general practice performance
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Morris ZS, Wooding S, Grant J. The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research. J R Soc Med. 2011; 104 (12):510–520. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2011.110180. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boaz A, Hanney S, Jones T, Soper B. Does the engagement of clinicians and organisations in research improve healthcare performance: a three-stage review. BMJ Open. 2015; 5 (12):e009415. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009415. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Downing A, Morris EJ, Corrigan N, et al. High hospital research participation and improved colorectal cancer survival outcomes: a population-based study. Gut. 2017; 66 (1):89–96. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-311308. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jonker L, Fisher SJ, Badgett RG. Hospital clinical research activity, rather than staff motivational engagement, significantly links effective staff communication and favourable patient feedback; a cross-sectional study. J Healthc Qual Res. 2022; 37 (1):44–51.:S2603-6479(21)00070-1. doi: 10.1016/j.jhqr.2021.06.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jonker L, Fisher SJ, Dagnan D. Patients admitted to more research-active hospitals have more confidence in staff and are better informed about their condition and medication: results from a retrospective cross-sectional study. J Eval Clin Pract. 2020; 26 (1):203–208. doi: 10.1111/jep.13118. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources