Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2024 Jun;29(6):681-688.
doi: 10.1007/s10147-024-02504-4. Epub 2024 Apr 23.

Comparison between a single dose of PEG G-CSF and multiple doses of non-PEG G-CSF: a systematic review and meta-analysis from Clinical Practice Guidelines for the use of G-CSF 2022

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Comparison between a single dose of PEG G-CSF and multiple doses of non-PEG G-CSF: a systematic review and meta-analysis from Clinical Practice Guidelines for the use of G-CSF 2022

Tetsuhiro Yoshinami et al. Int J Clin Oncol. 2024 Jun.

Abstract

Backgroud: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is widely used for the primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia (FN). Two types of G-CSF are available in Japan, namely G-CSF chemically bound to polyethylene glycol (PEG G-CSF), which provides long-lasting effects with a single dose, and non-polyethylene glycol-bound G-CSF (non-PEG G-CSF), which must be sequentially administrated for several days.

Methods: This current study investigated the utility of these treatments for the primary prophylaxis of FN through a systematic review of the literature. A detailed literature search for related studies was performed using PubMed, Ichushi-Web, and the Cochrane Library. Data were independently extracted and assessed by two reviewers. A qualitative analysis or meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate six outcomes.

Results: Through the first and second screenings, 23 and 18 articles were extracted for qualitative synthesis and meta-analysis, respectively. The incidence of FN was significantly lower in the PEG G-CSF group than in the non-PEG G-CSF group with a strong quality/certainty of evidence. The differences in other outcomes, such as overall survival, infection-related mortality, the duration of neutropenia (less than 500/μL), quality of life, and pain, were not apparent.

Conclusions: A single dose of PEG G-CSF is strongly recommended over multiple-dose non-PEG G-CSF therapy for the primary prophylaxis of FN.

Keywords: Meta-analysis; Multiple doses; Non-PEG G-CSF; PEG G-CSF; Single dose.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Crawford J, Caserta C, Roila F et al (2010) Hematopoietic growth factors: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the applications. Ann Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdq195 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aapro MS, Bohlius J, Cameron DA et al (2011) 2010 update of EORTC guidelines for the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor to reduce the incidence of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in adult patients with lymphoproliferative disorders and solid tumours. Eur J Cancer. 47(1):8–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2010.10.013 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smith TJ, Bohlke K, Lyman GH et al (2015) Recommendations for the use of WBC growth factors: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol 33(28):3199–3212. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.62.3488 - DOI - PubMed
    1. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Hematopoietic growth factors Version 2. 2023
    1. Yang BB, Kido A (2011) Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of pegfilgrastim. Clin Pharmacokinet 50(5):295–306. https://doi.org/10.2165/11586040-000000000-00000 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources