Comparison between a single dose of PEG G-CSF and multiple doses of non-PEG G-CSF: a systematic review and meta-analysis from Clinical Practice Guidelines for the use of G-CSF 2022
- PMID: 38649648
- DOI: 10.1007/s10147-024-02504-4
Comparison between a single dose of PEG G-CSF and multiple doses of non-PEG G-CSF: a systematic review and meta-analysis from Clinical Practice Guidelines for the use of G-CSF 2022
Abstract
Backgroud: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is widely used for the primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia (FN). Two types of G-CSF are available in Japan, namely G-CSF chemically bound to polyethylene glycol (PEG G-CSF), which provides long-lasting effects with a single dose, and non-polyethylene glycol-bound G-CSF (non-PEG G-CSF), which must be sequentially administrated for several days.
Methods: This current study investigated the utility of these treatments for the primary prophylaxis of FN through a systematic review of the literature. A detailed literature search for related studies was performed using PubMed, Ichushi-Web, and the Cochrane Library. Data were independently extracted and assessed by two reviewers. A qualitative analysis or meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate six outcomes.
Results: Through the first and second screenings, 23 and 18 articles were extracted for qualitative synthesis and meta-analysis, respectively. The incidence of FN was significantly lower in the PEG G-CSF group than in the non-PEG G-CSF group with a strong quality/certainty of evidence. The differences in other outcomes, such as overall survival, infection-related mortality, the duration of neutropenia (less than 500/μL), quality of life, and pain, were not apparent.
Conclusions: A single dose of PEG G-CSF is strongly recommended over multiple-dose non-PEG G-CSF therapy for the primary prophylaxis of FN.
Keywords: Meta-analysis; Multiple doses; Non-PEG G-CSF; PEG G-CSF; Single dose.
© 2024. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Japan Society of Clinical Oncology.
References
-
- Crawford J, Caserta C, Roila F et al (2010) Hematopoietic growth factors: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the applications. Ann Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdq195 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Aapro MS, Bohlius J, Cameron DA et al (2011) 2010 update of EORTC guidelines for the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor to reduce the incidence of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in adult patients with lymphoproliferative disorders and solid tumours. Eur J Cancer. 47(1):8–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2010.10.013 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Smith TJ, Bohlke K, Lyman GH et al (2015) Recommendations for the use of WBC growth factors: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol 33(28):3199–3212. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.62.3488 - DOI - PubMed
-
- NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Hematopoietic growth factors Version 2. 2023
-
- Yang BB, Kido A (2011) Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of pegfilgrastim. Clin Pharmacokinet 50(5):295–306. https://doi.org/10.2165/11586040-000000000-00000 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
