Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 22;24(1):429.
doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-09310-3.

Evaluation of angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), angiotensin II (Ang II), miR-141-3p, and miR-421 levels in SARS-CoV-2 patients: a case-control study

Affiliations

Evaluation of angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), angiotensin II (Ang II), miR-141-3p, and miR-421 levels in SARS-CoV-2 patients: a case-control study

Ehsan Kakavandi et al. BMC Infect Dis. .

Abstract

Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a highly contagious virus that uses angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), a pivotal member of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS), as its cell-entry receptor. Another member of the RAS, angiotensin II (Ang II), is the major biologically active component in this system. There is growing evidence suggesting that serum miRNAs could serve as prognostic biomarkers for SARS-CoV-2 infection and regulate ACE2 expression. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate the changes in the serum levels of sACE2 and Ang II, as well as the expression level of miR-141-3p and miR-421 in SARS-CoV-2 positive and negative subjects.

Methods: In the present study, the serum levels of sACE2 and Ang II were measured in 94 SARS-CoV-2 positive patients and 94 SARS-CoV-2 negative subjects with some symptoms similar to those of SARS-CoV-2 positive patients using the ELISA method. In addition, the expression level of miR-141-3p and miR-421 as ACE2 regulators and biomarkers was evaluated using quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) method.

Results: The mean serum sACE2 concentration in the SARS-CoV-2-positive group was 3.268 ± 0.410 ng/ml, whereas in the SARS-CoV-2 negative group, it was 3.564 ± 0.437 ng/ml. Additionally, the mean serum Ang II level in the SARS-CoV-2 positive and negative groups were 60.67 ± 6.192 ng/L and 67.97 ± 6.837 ng/L, respectively. However, there was no significant difference in the serum levels of sACE2 (P value: 0.516) and Ang II (P value: 0.134) between the SARS-CoV-2 positive and negative groups. Meanwhile, our findings indicated that the expression levels of miR-141-3p and miR-421 in SARS-CoV-2 positive group were significantly lower and higher than SARS-CoV-2 negative group, respectively (P value < 0.001).

Conclusions: Taken together, the results of this study showed that the serum levels of sACE2 and Ang II in SARS-CoV-2 positive and negative subjects were not significantly different, but the expression levels of miR-141-3p and miR-421 were altered in SARS-CoV-2 positive patients which need more investigation to be used as biomarkers for COVID-19 diagnosis.

Keywords: Angiotensin II; Angiotensin converting enzyme 2; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; miR-141-3p; miR-421.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study flow diagram
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Standard curve of ELISA for sACE2 (A) and Ang II (B) quantitation. OD; optical density
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Serum sACE2 (A) and Ang II (B) levels in the SARS-CoV-2-positive (case) and -negative (control) groups. The data are presented as the mean ± SEM. The Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparisons between study groups
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Expression of miR-141-3p (A) and miR-421 (B) levels in the SARS-CoV-2-positive (case) and -negative (control) groups. The data are presented as the mean ± SEM. The Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparisons between study groups
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Scatter plots representing the correlation between the expression of miR-141-3p and miR-421 with sACE2 and Ang II levels in SARS-CoV-2-positive and negative subjects

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Deslandes A, Berti V, Tandjaoui-Lambotte Y, Alloui C, Carbonnelle E, Zahar J, et al. SARS-CoV-2 was already spreading in France in late December 2019. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020;55(6):106006. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.106006. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Basavaraju SV, Patton ME, Grimm K, Rasheed MAU, Lester S, Mills L, et al. Serologic Testing of US blood donations to identify severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)–Reactive antibodies: December 2019–January 2020. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;72(12):e1004–9. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1785. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Merad M, Blish CA, Sallusto F, Iwasaki A. The immunology and immunopathology of COVID-19. Science (New York, NY). 2022;375(6585):1122-7. - PubMed
    1. Channappanavar R, Fehr AR, Vijay R, Mack M, Zhao J, Meyerholz DK, et al. Dysregulated type I interferon and inflammatory monocyte-macrophage responses cause lethal pneumonia in SARS-CoV-infected mice. Cell Host Microbe. 2016;19(2):181–93. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2016.01.007. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shatizadeh Malekshahi S, Yavarian J, Shafiei-Jandaghi NZ. Usage of peptidases by SARS-CoV-2 and several human coronaviruses as receptors: a mysterious story. Biotechnol Appl Chem. 2022;69(1):124–8. - PubMed

Publication types