Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 22;19(1):173.
doi: 10.1186/s13023-024-03160-7.

The value of knowing: preferences for genetic testing to diagnose rare muscle diseases

Affiliations

The value of knowing: preferences for genetic testing to diagnose rare muscle diseases

Carol Mansfield et al. Orphanet J Rare Dis. .

Abstract

Background: Genetic testing can offer early diagnosis and subsequent treatment of rare neuromuscular diseases. Options for these tests could be improved by understanding the preferences of patients for the features of different genetic tests, especially features that increase information available to patients.

Methods: We developed an online discrete-choice experiment using key attributes of currently available tests for Pompe disease with six test attributes: number of rare muscle diseases tested for with corresponding probability of diagnosis, treatment availability, time from testing to results, inclusion of secondary findings, necessity of a muscle biopsy, and average time until final diagnosis if the first test is negative. Respondents were presented a choice between two tests with different costs, with respondents randomly assigned to one of two costs. Data were analyzed using random-parameters logit.

Results: A total of 600 online respondents, aged 18 to 50 years, were recruited from the U.S. general population and included in the final analysis. Tests that targeted more diseases, required less time from testing to results, included information about unrelated health risks, and were linked to shorter time to the final diagnosis were preferred and associated with diseases with available treatment. Men placed relatively more importance than women on tests for diseases with available treatments. Most of the respondents would be more willing to get a genetic test that might return unrelated health information, with women exhibiting a statistically significant preference. While respondents were sensitive to cost, 30% of the sample assigned to the highest cost was willing to pay $500 for a test that could offer a diagnosis almost 2 years earlier.

Conclusion: The results highlight the value people place on the information genetic tests can provide about their health, including faster diagnosis of rare, unexplained muscle weakness, but also the value of tests for multiple diseases, diseases without treatments, and incidental findings. An earlier time to diagnosis can provide faster access to treatment and an end to the diagnostic journey, which patients highly prefer.

Keywords: Diagnosis; Discrete-choice experiment; Genetic test; Neuromuscular disease; Pompe disease; Screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CM is a full-time employee of RTI Health Solutions, an independent nonprofit research organization, which received funding pursuant to a contract from Sanofi to conduct the study that is the subject of this manuscript. MB and JC were employees of RTI Health Solutions at the time the study was conducted. SS, KAH, and AH are employees of Sanofi and may hold shares and/or stock options in the company. EB was an employee of Sanofi at the time the study was conducted and may hold shares and/or stock options in the company.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Preference weights (A) and conditional relative attribute importance (B) for overall respondents. aThe vertical bars surrounding each weight estimate indicate 95% confidence intervals
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Probability of selecting each test. (A) Change in probability that respondents selected each test when cost was included. (B) Probability of selecting a test for 1 disease with a treatment over a test for 100 diseases with no treatments.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Grigull L, Lechner W, Petri S, Kollewe K, Dengler R, Mehmecke S, et al. Diagnostic support for selected neuromuscular diseases using answer-pattern recognition and data mining techniques: a proof of concept multicenter prospective trial. BMC Med Inf Decis Mak. 2016;16:31. doi: 10.1186/s12911-016-0268-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Qian Y, McGraw S, Henne J, Jarecki J, Hobby K, Yeh WS. Understanding the experiences and needs of individuals with spinal muscular atrophy and their parents: a qualitative study. BMC Neurol. 2015;15:217. doi: 10.1186/s12883-015-0473-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Paganoni S, Nicholson K, Leigh F, Swoboda K, Chad D, Drake K, et al. Developing multidisciplinary clinics for neuromuscular care and research. Muscle Nerve. 2017;56(5):848–58. doi: 10.1002/mus.25725. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kassardjian CD, Amato AA, Boon AJ, Childers MK, Klein CJ, Committee APP. The utility of genetic testing in neuromuscular disease: a consensus statement from the AANEM on the clinical utility of genetic testing in diagnosis of neuromuscular disease. Muscle Nerve. 2016;54(6):1007–9. doi: 10.1002/mus.25387. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zatz M, Passos-Bueno MR, Vainzof M. Neuromuscular disorders: genes, genetic counseling and therapeutic trials. Genet Mol Biology. 2016;39(3):339–48. doi: 10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2016-0019. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Grants and funding