Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul 15;8(1):62.
doi: 10.1186/s40643-021-00395-1.

Simultaneous degradation of two mycotoxins enabled by a fusion enzyme in food-grade recombinant Kluyveromyces lactis

Affiliations

Simultaneous degradation of two mycotoxins enabled by a fusion enzyme in food-grade recombinant Kluyveromyces lactis

Yu Xia et al. Bioresour Bioprocess. .

Abstract

Aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) and zearalenone (ZEN) are two predominant mycotoxins ubiquitously found in corn, peanuts, and other grains, which pose a great threat to human health. Therefore, safe and effective methods for detoxification of these mycotoxins are urgently needed. To achieve simultaneous degradation of multiple mycotoxins, a fusion enzyme ZPF1 was constructed by linking zearalenone hydrolase and manganese peroxidase with a linker peptide GGGGS. This fusion enzyme was secretory expressed successfully in the newly constructed food-grade recombinant strain Kluyveromyces lactis GG799(pKLAC1-ZPF1), and was investigated with the mycotoxins degradation efficiency in two reaction systems. Results showed that both AFB1 and ZEN can be degraded by ZPF1 in reaction system 1 (70.0 mmol/L malonic buffer with 1.0 mmol/L MnSO4, 0.1 mmol/L H2O2, 5.0 µg/mL AFB1 and ZEN, respectively) with the ratios of 46.46% and 38.76%, respectively. In reaction system 2 (50.0 mmol/L Tris-HCl, with 5.0 µg/mL AFB1 and ZEN, respectively), AFB1 cannot be degraded while ZEN can be degraded with the ratio of 35.38%. To improve the degradation efficiency of these mycotoxins, optimization of the induction and degradation conditions were fulfilled subsequently. The degradation ratios of AFB1 and ZEN by ZPF1 in reaction system 1 reached 64.11% ± 2.93% and 46.21% ± 3.17%, respectively. While in reaction system 2, ZEN was degraded by ZPF1 at a ratio of 41.45% ± 3.34%. The increases of degradation ratios for AFB1 and ZEN in reaction system 1 were 17.65% and 7.45%, respectively, while that for ZEN in reaction system 2 was 6.07%, compared with the unoptimized results.

Keywords: Kluyveromyces lactis; Aflatoxin B1; Degradation; Food-grade; Fusion enzyme; Mycotoxins; Zearalenone.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart for construction of fusion genes and recombinant plasmids
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Construction and expression of fusion enzyme ZPF1, and the degradation efficiency of AFB1 and ZEN by ZFP1. a The electrophoresis of the PCR results of the 3 positive transformants: M: DNA marker; L1 to L3: PCR results of 3 positive GG799(pKLAC1-ZPF1) transformants. b SDS-PAGE results of culture supernatants of the 3 positive transformants: M: Protein marker; L1: K. lactis GG799 supernatant proteins; L2: K. lactis GG799(pKLAC1) supernatant proteins; L3 to L5: Three K. lactis GG799(pKLAC1-ZPF1) transformants’ supernatant protein. c Degradation results of AFB1 (reaction system 1) and ZEN (reaction system 2) by the 3 transformants. Different letters above the histogram are significant differences (p < 0.05)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Enzyme activity of PhcMnp and ZHD101.1 expressed by ZPF1 under different induction conditions. The left axes were the PhcMnp enzyme activities, and the right axes were the degradation ratios of ZEN (by ZHD101.1). a–e were the effects of time, temperature, galactose concentrations, MnSO4 concentrations and hemin concentrations on the enzyme activities of the ZPF1
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Degradation of AFB1 and ZEN by ZPF1 under different conditions in reaction system 1. a–f were the effects of time, temperature, protein concentrations, pH of buffer, concentrations of MnSO4 and concentrations of H2O2. Different letters above the histogram were significant differences (p < 0.05)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Degradation of ZEN by ZPF1 under different conditions in reaction system 2. a–d were the effects of time, temperature, protein concentrations and pH of buffer. Different letters above the histogram were significant differences (p < 0.05)

References

    1. Adebo OA, Njobeh PB, Gbashi S, Nwinyi OC, Mavumengwana V. Review on microbial degradation of aflatoxins. Food Sci Nutr. 2015;57(15):3208–3217. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2015.1106440. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Afshar P, Shokrzadeh M, Raeisi SN, Ghorbani-HasanSaraei A, Nasiraii LR. Aflatoxins biodetoxification strategies based on probiotic bacteria. Toxicon. 2020;178:50–58. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2020.02.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alassane-Kpembi I, Schatzmayr G, Taranu I, Marin D, Puel O, Oswald IP. Mycotoxins co-contamination: Methodological aspects and biological relevance of combined toxicity studies. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2017;57(16):3489–3507. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2016.1140632. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arai R, Ueda H, Kitayama A, Kamiya N, Nagamune T. Design of the linkers which effectively separate domains of a bifunctional fusion protein. Protein Eng. 2001;14(8):529–532. doi: 10.1093/protein/14.8.529. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Armando MR, Pizzolitto RP, Dogi CA, Cristofolini A, Merkis C, Poloni V, Dalcero AM, Cavaglieri LR. Adsorption of ochratoxin A and zearalenone by potential probiotic Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains and its relation with cell wall thickness. J Appl Microbiol. 2012;113:256–264. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05331.x. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources