Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 8:15:1351882.
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1351882. eCollection 2024.

Effect of P. corylifolia on the pharmacokinetic profile of tofacitinib and the underlying mechanism

Affiliations

Effect of P. corylifolia on the pharmacokinetic profile of tofacitinib and the underlying mechanism

Yu Wang et al. Front Pharmacol. .

Abstract

This work aimed to explore the mechanisms underlying the interaction of the active furanocoumarins in P. corylifolia on tofacitinib both in vivo and in vitro. The concentration of tofacitinib and its metabolite M8 was determined using UPLC-MS/MS. The peak area ratio of M8 to tofacitinib was calculated to compare the inhibitory ability of furanocoumarin contained in the traditional Chinese medicine P. corylifolia in rat liver microsomes (RLMs), human liver microsomes (HLMs) and recombinant human CYP3A4 (rCYP3A4). We found that bergapten and isopsoralen exhibited more significant inhibitory activity in RLMs than other furanocoumarins. Bergapten and isopsoralen were selected to investigate tofacitinib drug interactions in vitro and in vivo. Thirty rats were randomly allocated into 5 groups (n = 6): control (0.5% CMC-Na), low-dose bergapten (20 mg/kg), high-dose bergapten (50 mg/kg), low-dose isopsoralen (20 mg/kg) and ketoconazole. 10 mg/kg of tofacitinib was orally intervented to each rat and the concentration level of tofacitinib in the rats were determined by UPLC-MS/MS. More imporrantly, the results showed that bergapten and isopsoralen significantly inhibited the metabolism of tofacitinib metabolism. The AUC(0-t), AUC(0-∞), MRT(0-t), MRT(0-∞) and Cmax of tofacitinib increased in varying degrees compared with the control group (all p < 0.05), but CLz/F decreased in varying degrees (p < 0.05) in the different dose bergapten group and isopsoralen group. Bergapten, isopsoralen and tofacitinib exhibit similar binding capacities with CYP3A4 by AutoDock 4.2 software, confirming that they compete for tofacitinib metabolism. P. corylifolia may considerably impact the metabolism of tofacitinib, which can provide essential information for the accurate therapeutic application of tofacitinib.

Keywords: P. corylifolia; cytochrome P450; drug-drug interaction; molecular docking; pharmacokinetics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
(A) Michaelis-Menten plots of enzymatic activity of RLMs, HLMs and rCYP3A4 on tofacitinib metabolism. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation of three experiments. (B) Screening of bergapten, psoralidin, xanthotoxol, psoralen, isopsoralen, and 8-methoxypsoralen in RLMs. Values are mean ± SD, n = 3. *p < 0.05, significant difference from control group.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
(A) IC50 of the inhibition of tofacitinib in RLMs by bergapten; (B) IC50 of the inhibition of tofacitinib in HLMs by bergapten; (C) IC50 of the inhibition of tofacitinib in rCYP3A4 by bergapten. Values are mean ± SD, n = 3.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Inhibitory mechanism of bergapten against tofacitinib in (A,B) RLMs, (C,D) HLMs and (E,F) rCYP3A4. Values are mean ± SD, n = 3.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
(A) IC50 of tofacitinib inhibition in RLMs by isopsoralen; (B) IC50 of tofacitinib inhibition in HLMs by isopsoralen; (C) IC50 of tofacitinib inhibition in rCYP3A4 by isopsoralen.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Inhibitory mechanism of isopsoralen against tofacitinib in (A,B) RLMs, (C,D) HLMs and (E,F) rCYP3A4. Values are mean ± SD, n = 3.
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
Molecular docking scheme of tofacitub and bergapten (A) and isopsoralen (C); Action site between bergapten (B), isopsoralen (D) and tofacitinib and CYP3A4 via hydrogen bonding.
FIGURE 7
FIGURE 7
Mean plasma concentration–time curves of tofacitinib in different treatment groups. Group (A), bergapten; group (B), isopsoralen (n = 6).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abdulrahim H., Sharlala H., Adebajo A. O. (2019). An evaluation of tofacitinib for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 20 (16), 1953–1960. 10.1080/14656566.2019.1657404 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alam F., Khan G. N., Asad M. (2018). Psoralea corylifolia L: ethnobotanical, biological, and chemical aspects: a review. Phytother. Res. 32 (4), 597–615. 10.1002/ptr.6006 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aronson J. K. (2004). Classifying drug interactions. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 58 (4), 343–344. 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2004.02244.x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bannwarth B., Kostine M., Poursac N. (2013). A pharmacokinetic and clinical assessment of tofacitinib for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol. 9 (6), 753–761. 10.1517/17425255.2013.789500 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beaugerie L., Rahier J. F., Kirchgesner J. (2020). Predicting, preventing, and managing treatment-related complications in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 18 (6), 1324–1335. 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.02.009 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources