Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 8:15:1365743.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1365743. eCollection 2024.

The asymmetric impact of decision-making confidence on regret and relief

Affiliations

The asymmetric impact of decision-making confidence on regret and relief

Zan Liu. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

When individuals make uncertain decisions, they often evaluate the correctness of their choices in what is referred to as decision-making confidence. The outcomes of such decision-making can lead to counterfactual thinking wherein alternative possible outcomes are contemplated. This, in turn, can elicit counterfactual emotions including upward and downward counterfactual thinking, which, respectively, refer to regret and relief. Decision-making confidence and counterfactual emotions have key effects on how individuals learn from the past and prepare for the future. However, there has been little understanding of how these experiences are related. For this study, 98 total adults were recruited with the goal of assessing the connections between decision-making confidence and sensations of regret and relief when completing a card-based gambling task. The results of this study suggest that decision-making confidence may reduce the intensity of relief while increasing the degree of regret experienced. These findings thus emphasize the important effect that decision confidence has on emotional processing.

Keywords: action effect; counterfactual thinking; decision-making confidence; regret; relief.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Experimental approach and scoring rules.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Emotional differences among different conditions. Two-way ANOVA results: 2 (choice: action & inaction) × 3 (outcome condition: negative, neutral, and positive) (The Raincloud plots are made up of three parts, namely density estimate plot, box plot, and dithering scatter plot).

Similar articles

References

    1. Allaert J., De Raedt R., van der Veen F. M., Baeken C., Vanderhasselt M. A. (2021). Prefrontal tDCS attenuates counterfactual thinking in female individuals prone to self-critical rumination. Sci. Rep. 11, 11601–11614. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90677-7, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bault N., Wydoodt P., Coricelli G. (2016). Different attentional patterns for regret and disappointment: an eye-tracking study. J. Behav. Decis. Mak. 29, 194–205. doi: 10.1002/bdm.1938, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bell D. E. (1982). Regret in decision-making under uncertainty. Oper. Res. 30, 961–981. doi: 10.1287/opre.30.5.961 - DOI
    1. Briazu R. A., Walsh C. R., Deeprose C., Ganis G. (2017). Undoing the past in order to lie in the present: counterfactual thinking and deceptive communication. Cognition 161, 66–73. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.01.003, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brus J., Aebersold H., Grueschow M., Polania R. (2021). Sources of confidence in value-based choice. Nat. Commun. 12, 7337. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27618-5, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed