Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2024 Apr 8:14:1372382.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1372382. eCollection 2024.

Case report: Salivary duct carcinoma in a patient with a germline CDH1 pathogenic variant - expanding the spectrum of hereditary cancer predisposition syndromes

Affiliations
Case Reports

Case report: Salivary duct carcinoma in a patient with a germline CDH1 pathogenic variant - expanding the spectrum of hereditary cancer predisposition syndromes

Nidhi Desai et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

Introduction: Recently, an entity known as salivary duct carcinoma with rhabdoid features (SDC-RF) has been associated with somatic CDH1 mutations. Here we present the first known case report of conventional SDC occurring in the setting of a germline CDH1 pathogenic variant accompanied by a somatic loss of heterozygosity at the CDH1 locus.

Case discussion: A 67-year-old man presented with chest and back pain and was found to have osteolytic lesions in the sternum and lumbar spine. Vertebral bone biopsies were positive for metastatic carcinoma of unknown primary. A molecular profiling assay consisting of both whole-exome next-generation sequencing (NGS) as well as immunohistochemistry (IHC) for select clinically-relevant proteins performed on the bone biopsy suggested a triple-negative (ER/PR/ERBB2 negative, by IHC), androgen receptor (AR IHC) positive tumor profile. Additionally, the assay uncovered a coding mutation in the CDH1 gene (c.1792C>T, p.R598*) with genomic loss of the second CDH1 allele. Germline testing returned positive for a heterozygous CDH1 pathogenic variant. PET-CT revealed a tumor in the neck suggestive of the primary malignancy consistent with that of salivary gland origin. The patient was initially treated with carboplatin and paclitaxel, then pembrolizumab, and finally with AR-directed therapy using leuprolide and enzalutamide. These treatments were not successful, and the patient eventually succumbed to his disease.

Conclusion: Molecular testing revealed that our patient had bi-allelic inactivation of the CDH1 gene. We believe our patient developed a somatic mutation in addition to his preexisting germline CDH1 mutation that ultimately predisposed him to SDC. While previous studies have found somatic CDH1 pathogenic variants in SDC-RF, our patient was found to have a germline CDH1 pathogenic variant in the setting of conventional SDC, without rhabdoid features. This case provokes questions regarding tumor genetics and molecular profiling of SDC in patients with germline CDH1 pathogenic variants. Moreover, this case supports the notion that SDC may be the salivary counterpart of other malignancies associated with germline CDH1 pathogenic variants and may possibly expand the spectrum of tumors that arise in this familial cancer-predisposition syndrome.

Keywords: CDH1; cancer; germline; pathogenic variant; salivary duct carcinoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

ESA is a paid consultant/advisor to Janssen, Astellas, Sanofi, Dendreon, Pfizer, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Bayer, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Clovis, Merck, Curium, Blue Earth Diagnostics, Foundation Medicine, Exact Sciences and Invitae; has received research funding to his institution from Janssen, Johnson & Johnson, Sanofi, Dendreon, Genentech, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Bayer, AstraZeneca, Clovis and Merck; and is the coinventor of a patented AR-V7 biomarker technology that has been licensed to Qiagen. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Immunohistochemistry studies of biopsy of metastatic tumor of unknown primary from the eighth and tenth thoracic vertebrae (T8 and T10) (A) Hematoxylin Eosin (H/E). 100x, showing clusters of large atypical cells with medium sized nucleoli and moderate amount of eosinophilic cytoplasm. (B) H/E, 400x (C) H/E, 600x (D) AE1/AE3 immunohistochemistry, 100x, showing diffuse and strongly positive staining of tumor cells. (E) CK7 immunohistochemistry. 100x, showing diffuse and strongly positive staining of tumor cells. (F) GATA-3 immunohistochemistry, 100x, showing diffuse and strongly positive staining of tumor cells.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) E-cadherin immunohistochemistry, 100x, tumor cells are negative for E-cadherin. (B) AR immunohistochemistry. 200x, showing positive staining of tumor cells.
Figure 3
Figure 3
A timeline of the treatments our patient received throughout his treatment course. Time from the start of the first line of therapy to the occurrence of first relapse (PFS1) was 5 months and overall survival was 17 months.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Molecular karyotype generated by detecting copy number gains and losses from next-generation sequencing data using CNVkit. More specifically, loss of heterozygosity (LOH) is seen on chromosome 16 at the CDH1 locus (chr16 q22.1) indicating that our patient had bi-allelic inactivation of the CDH1 gene.

References

    1. Corso G, Montagna G, Figueiredo J, La Vecchia C, Fumagalli Romario U, Fernandes MS, et al. . Hereditary gastric and breast cancer syndromes related to Cdh1 germline mutation: A multidisciplinary clinical review. Cancers. (2020) 12:1598. doi: 10.3390/cancers12061598 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Van Roy F, Berx G. The cell-cell adhesion molecule E-cadherin. Cell Mol Life Sci. (2008) 65:3756–88. doi: 10.1007/s00018-008-8281-1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Massari G, Magnoni F, Favia G, Peradze N, Veronesi P, La Vecchia C, et al. . Frequency of Cdh1 germline mutations in non-gastric cancers. Cancers. (2021) 13:2321. doi: 10.3390/cancers13102321 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Roberts ME, Ranola JM, Marshall ML, Susswein LR, Graceffo S, Bohnert K, et al. . Comparison of cdh1 penetrance estimates in clinically ascertained families vs families ascertained for multiple gastric cancers. JAMA Oncol. (2019) 5:1325. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.1208 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Laughlin BS, Ebrahimi S, Voss MM, Patel SH, Foote RL, McGee LA, et al. . Clinicopathologic factors and their association with outcomes of salivary duct carcinoma: A multicenter experience. Adv Radiat Oncol. (2023) 8:101204. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101204 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types