Robotic-assisted radical cystectomy with cutaneous ureterostomies: a contemporary multicenter analysis
- PMID: 38652316
- DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04942-1
Robotic-assisted radical cystectomy with cutaneous ureterostomies: a contemporary multicenter analysis
Abstract
Background: Robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) offers decreased blood loss during surgery, shorter hospital length of stay, and lower risk for thromboembolic events without hindering oncological outcomes. Cutaneous ureterostomies (UCS) are a seldom utilized diversion that can be a suitable alternative for a selected group of patients with competing co-morbidities and limited life expectancy.
Objective: To describe operative and perioperative characteristics as well as oncological outcomes for patients that underwent RARC + UCS.
Methods: Patients that underwent RARC + UCS during 2013-2023 in 3 centers (EU = 2, US = 1) were identified in a prospectively maintained database. Baseline characteristics, pathological, and oncological outcomes were analyzed. Descriptive statistics and survival analysis were performed using R language version 4.3.1.
Results: Sixty-nine patients were included. The median age was 77 years (IQR 70-80) and the median follow-up time was 11 months (IQR 4-20). Ten patients were ASA 4 (14.5%). Nine patients underwent palliative cystectomy (13%). The median operation time was 241 min (IQR 202-290), and the median hospital stay was 8 days (IQR 6-11). The 30-day complication rate was 55.1% (grade ≥ 3a was 14.4%), and the 30-day readmission rate was 17.4%. Eleven patients developed metastatic recurrence (15.9%), and 14 patients (20.2%) died during the follow-up period. Overall survival at 6, 12, and 24 months was 84%, 81%, and 73%, respectively.
Conclusions: RARC + UCS may offer lower complication and readmission rates without the need to perform enteric anastomosis, it can be considered in a selected group of patients with competing co-morbidities, or limited life expectancy. Larger prospective studies are necessary to validate these results.
Keywords: Radical cystectomy; Ureterostomy; Urinary bladder neoplasms; Urinary diversion.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Systematic review and cumulative analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical cystectomy.Eur Urol. 2015 Mar;67(3):376-401. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.007. Epub 2015 Jan 2. Eur Urol. 2015. PMID: 25560798
-
Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy Versus Open Radical Cystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Perioperative, Oncological, and Quality of Life Outcomes Using Randomized Controlled Trials.Eur Urol. 2023 Oct;84(4):393-405. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.04.004. Epub 2023 May 9. Eur Urol. 2023. PMID: 37169638
-
Systematic review and cumulative analysis of oncologic and functional outcomes after robot-assisted radical cystectomy.Eur Urol. 2015 Mar;67(3):402-22. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.008. Epub 2015 Jan 2. Eur Urol. 2015. PMID: 25560797
-
Best practices in robot-assisted radical cystectomy and urinary reconstruction: recommendations of the Pasadena Consensus Panel.Eur Urol. 2015 Mar;67(3):363-75. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.009. Epub 2015 Jan 9. Eur Urol. 2015. PMID: 25582930
-
Safety and Effectiveness of Robot-Assisted Versus Open Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 Nov;27(11):1109-1120. doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0437. Epub 2017 Mar 28. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017. PMID: 28350238
Cited by
-
Evaluating the Survival Benefits of Perioperative Chemotherapy in Frail and Morbid Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Patients.J Pers Med. 2024 Sep 9;14(9):954. doi: 10.3390/jpm14090954. J Pers Med. 2024. PMID: 39338209 Free PMC article.
-
Cutaneous ureterostomy following robot-assisted radical cystectomy: a multicenter comparative study of transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal techniques.World J Urol. 2024 Oct 23;42(1):591. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05300-x. World J Urol. 2024. PMID: 39441314 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Alfred Witjes J, Lebret T, Compérat EM et al (2017) Updated 2016 EAU guidelines on muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer. Eur Urol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.06.020 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Mastroianni R, Tuderti G, Ferriero M et al (2024) Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with totally intracorporeal urinary diversion versus open radical cystectomy: 3-year outcomes from a randomised controlled trial. Eur Urol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2024.01.018 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Parekh DJ, Reis IM, Castle EP et al (2018) Robot-assisted radical cystectomy versus open radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer (RAZOR): an open-label, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet (London, England) 391(10139):2525–2536. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30996-6 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Catto JWF, Khetrapal P, Ricciardi F et al (2022) Effect of robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion vs open radical cystectomy on 90-day morbidity and mortality among patients with bladder cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 327(21):2092–2103. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.7393 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Huang H, Yan B, Hao H et al (2021) Laparoscopic versus open radical cystectomy in 607 patients with bladder cancer: comparative survival analysis. Int J Urol 28(6):673–680. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.14537 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical