Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2024 Apr 23;19(4):e0296723.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296723. eCollection 2024.

Risk factors of central catheter bloodstream infections in intensive care units: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Risk factors of central catheter bloodstream infections in intensive care units: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Huayong Huang et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Central catheter bloodstream infections (CRBSI) is a major cause of healthcare-associated infections. However, few factors are generally accepted and some studies have conflicting finding about some factors, possibly caused by limitation associated with an individual study. This study was to identify risk factors for CRBSI in intensive care units.

Methods: We searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of science and EMBASE databases and the 4 top Chinese-language databases, including WanFang data, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP), China Biology Medicine disc (CBM) as of July 2023. Case control and cohort studies were included. Two authors independently screened the literature and evaluated the quality of the studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS). The pooled effect size was estimated using the odds ratio (OR), and the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated. The Cochrane Q (χ2) and I2 tests were used to assess heterogeneity among studies, and each risk factor was tested for its robustness using fixed- or random-effects models.

Findings: A total of 32 studies enrolled, among which eleven factors were identified, they were divided into two categories: modifiable and unmodifiable factors. Modifiable factors: duration of catheterization (≥ 5d) (OR: 2.07, 95%CI: 1.41-3.03), duration of catheterization (≥ 7d) (OR: 3.62, 95%CI: 2.65-4.97), duration of catheterization (≥ 14d)(OR: 4.85, 95%CI: 3.35-7.01), total parenteral nutrition (OR: 2.27,95%CI: 1.56-3.29), use of multiple-lumen catheters(OR: 3.41, 95%CI: 2.27-5.11), times of tube indwelling (OR: 3.50, 95%CI: 2.93-4.17), length of ICU stay (OR: 4.05, 95%CI: 2.41-6.80), the position of indwelling(OR: 2.41, 95%CI: 2.03-2.85); Unmodifiable factors: APACHEII scores (OR: 1.84, 95%CI: 1.54-2.20), Age≥ 60 years old (OR: 2.19, 95%CI: 1.76-2.73), the extensive use of antibiotic (OR: 3.54, 95%CI: 1.65-7.61), Diabetes mellitus (OR: 3.06, 95%CI: 2.56-3.66), Immunosuppression (OR: 2.87, 95%CI: 2.08-3.95).

Conclusions: Effective interventions targeting the above modifiable factors may reduce the risk of developing CRBSI in ICU and improve the clinical outcome of patients. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Flow chart of the review process.
Fig 2
Fig 2. The forest plot shows the relationship between duration of catheterization and the risk of CRBSI.
Fig 3
Fig 3. The forest plot shows the relationship between duration of catheterization and the risk of CRBSI (adjusting).
Fig 4
Fig 4. The forest plot shows the relationship between times of tube indwelling and the risk of CRBSI.
Fig 5
Fig 5. The forest plot shows the relationship between times of tube indwelling and the risk of CRBSI (adjusting).
Fig 6
Fig 6. The forest plot shows the relationship between length of ICU stay and the risk of CRBSI.
Fig 7
Fig 7. The forest plot shows the relationship between length of ICU stay and the risk of CRBSI (adjusting).
Fig 8
Fig 8. The forest plot shows the relationship between APACHEII scores and the risk of CRBSI.
Fig 9
Fig 9. The forest plot shows the relationship between APACHEII scores and the risk of CRBSI (adjusting).
Fig 10
Fig 10. The forest plot shows the relationship between the position of indwelling and the risk of CRBSI Age ≥ 60 years old.
Fig 11
Fig 11. The forest plot shows the relationship between Age≥60 years old and the risk of CRBSI.
Fig 12
Fig 12. The forest plot shows the relationship between the extensive use of antibiotics and the risk of CRBSI.
Fig 13
Fig 13. The forest plot shows the relationship between use of multiple-lumen catheters and the risk of CRBSI.
Fig 14
Fig 14. The forest plot shows the relationship between Diabetes mellitus and the risk of CRBSI.
Fig 15
Fig 15. The forest plot shows the relationship between total parenteral nutrition and the risk of CRBSI.
Fig 16
Fig 16. The forest plot shows the relationship between total parenteral nutrition and the risk of CRBSI (adjusting).
Fig 17
Fig 17. The forest plot shows the relationship between immunosuppression and the risk of CRBSI.

References

    1. Gahlot R, Nigam C, Kumar V, et al.. Catheter-related bloodstream infections[J]. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci, 2014,4(2):162–167. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Takashima M, Schults J, Mihala G, et al.. Complication and Failures of Central Vascular Access Device in Adult Critical Care Settings[J]. Crit Care Med, 2018,46(12):1998–2009. - PubMed
    1. Siempos I I, Kopterides P, Tsangaris I, et al.. Impact of catheter-related bloodstream infections on the mortality of critically ill patients: a meta-analysis[J]. Crit Care Med, 2009,37(7):2283–2289. - PubMed
    1. Lu Y, Cai M H, Cheng J, et al.. A multi-center nested case-control study on hospitalization costs and length of stay due to healthcare-associated infection[J]. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control, 2018,7:99. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Malek A E, Raad I I. Preventing catheter-related infections in cancer patients: a review of current strategies[J]. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther, 2020, 18(6):531–538. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms