Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 23;11(1):416.
doi: 10.1038/s41597-024-03218-y.

Large-scale annotated dataset for cochlear hair cell detection and classification

Affiliations

Large-scale annotated dataset for cochlear hair cell detection and classification

Christopher J Buswinka et al. Sci Data. .

Abstract

Our sense of hearing is mediated by cochlear hair cells, of which there are two types organized in one row of inner hair cells and three rows of outer hair cells. Each cochlea contains 5-15 thousand terminally differentiated hair cells, and their survival is essential for hearing as they do not regenerate after insult. It is often desirable in hearing research to quantify the number of hair cells within cochlear samples, in both pathological conditions, and in response to treatment. Machine learning can be used to automate the quantification process but requires a vast and diverse dataset for effective training. In this study, we present a large collection of annotated cochlear hair-cell datasets, labeled with commonly used hair-cell markers and imaged using various fluorescence microscopy techniques. The collection includes samples from mouse, rat, guinea pig, pig, primate, and human cochlear tissue, from normal conditions and following in-vivo and in-vitro ototoxic drug application. The dataset includes over 107,000 hair cells which have been identified and annotated as either inner or outer hair cells. This dataset is the result of a collaborative effort from multiple laboratories and has been carefully curated to represent a variety of imaging techniques. With suggested usage parameters and a well-described annotation procedure, this collection can facilitate the development of generalizable cochlear hair-cell detection models or serve as a starting point for fine-tuning models for other analysis tasks. By providing this dataset, we aim to give other hearing research groups the opportunity to develop their own tools with which to analyze cochlear imaging data more fully, accurately, and with greater ease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Cochlear hair cell annotation workflow using a ‘human-in-the-loop’ annotation paradigm. (A) An exemplar cochlea from our dataset with IHCs and OHCs annotated. Bounding boxes and classification labels were generated for all hair cells along the sensory epithelium. Representative regions in the (B) apex, (C) middle, and (D) base are shown as insets. Bounding boxes and labels were generated using labelImg (E), an open-source object annotation software, with green boxes annotating OHCs and yellow boxes annotating IHCs. The annotation procedure was optimized using the human-in-the-loop paradigm (F), where annotations were first generated by a preliminary neural network, then manually corrected and used to further train and improve the preliminary network, iteratively enabling more accurate candidate detections.

Update of

  • Large-scale annotated dataset for cochlear hair cell detection and classification.
    Buswinka CJ, Rosenberg DB, Simikyan RG, Osgood RT, Fernandez K, Nitta H, Hayashi Y, Liberman LW, Nguyen E, Yildiz E, Kim J, Jarysta A, Renauld J, Wesson E, Thapa P, Bordiga P, McMurtry N, Llamas J, Kitcher SR, López-Porras AI, Cui R, Behnammanesh G, Bird JE, Ballesteros A, Vélez-Ortega AC, Edge AS, Deans MR, Gnedeva K, Shrestha BR, Manor U, Zhao B, Ricci AJ, Tarchini B, Basch M, Stepanyan RS, Landegger LD, Rutherford M, Liberman MC, Walters BJ, Kros CJ, Richardson GP, Cunningham LL, Indzhykulian AA. Buswinka CJ, et al. bioRxiv [Preprint]. 2023 Sep 1:2023.08.30.553559. doi: 10.1101/2023.08.30.553559. bioRxiv. 2023. Update in: Sci Data. 2024 Apr 23;11(1):416. doi: 10.1038/s41597-024-03218-y. PMID: 37693382 Free PMC article. Updated. Preprint.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lim DJ. Functional structure of the organ of Corti: a review. Hearing research. 1986;22:117–146. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(86)90089-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ashmore J. Tonotopy of cochlear hair cell biophysics (excl. mechanotransduction) Current opinion in physiology. 2020;18:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.cophys.2020.06.010. - DOI
    1. Schmiedt RA. Acoustic injury and the physiology of hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 1984;76:1293–1317. doi: 10.1121/1.391446. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ryan AF, Kujawa SG, Hammill T, Le Prell C, Kil J. Temporary and Permanent Noise-induced Threshold Shifts: A Review of Basic and Clinical Observations. Otol Neurotol. 2016;37:e271–275,. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001071. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kurabi A, Keithley EM, Housley GD, Ryan AF, Wong AC. Cellular mechanisms of noise-induced hearing loss. Hear Res. 2017;349:129–137. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.11.013. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types