Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 23;28(1):49.
doi: 10.1007/s10151-024-02922-6.

Robotic resection of presacral tumors

Affiliations

Robotic resection of presacral tumors

D Ferrari et al. Tech Coloproctol. .

Abstract

Background: Presacral tumors are a rare entity typically treated with an open surgical approach. A limited number of minimally invasive resections have been described. The aim of the study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of roboticresection of presacral tumors.

Methods: This is a retrospective single system analysis, conducted at a quaternary referral academic healthcare system, and included all patients who underwent a robotic excision of a presacral tumor between 2015 and 2023. Outcomes of interest were operative time, estimated blood loss, complications, length of stay, margin status, and recurrence rates.

Results: Sixteen patients (11 females and 5 males) were included. The median age of the cohort was 51 years (range 25-69 years). The median operative time was 197 min (range 98-802 min). The median estimated blood loss was 40 ml, ranging from 0 to 1800 ml, with one patient experiencing conversion to open surgery after uncontrolled hemorrhage. Urinary retention was the only postoperative complication that occurred in three patients (19%) and was solved within 30 days in all cases. The median length of stay was one day (range 1-6 days). The median follow-up was 6.7 months (range 1-110 months). All tumors were excised with appropriate margins, but one benign and one malignant tumor recurred (12.5%). Ten tumors were classified as congenital (one was malignant), two were mesenchymal (both malignant), and five were miscellaneous (one malignant).

Conclusions: Robotic resection of select presacral pathology is feasible and safe. Further studies must be conducted to determine complication rates, outcomes, and long-term safety profiles.

Keywords: Minimally invasive surgery; Presacral tumors; Robotic surgery; Tailgut cysts.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Hobson KG, Ghaemmaghami V, Roe JP, Goodnight JE, Khatri VP (2005) Tumors of the retrorectal space. Dis Colon Rectum 48(10):1964–1974 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Neale JA (2011) Retrorectal tumors. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 24(3):149–160 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Kelley SR, Dozois EJ (2022) Presacral tumors. The ASCRS textbook of colon and rectal surgery. Springer, pp 375–396 - DOI
    1. Uhlig BE, Johnson RL (1975) Presacral tumors and cysts in adults. Dis Colon Rectum 18(7):581–589 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Woodfield JC, Chalmers AG, Phillips N, Sagar PM (2008) Algorithms for the surgical management of retrorectal tumours. Br J Surg 95(2):214–221 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources