Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug;113(2):190-200.
doi: 10.1111/ejh.14214. Epub 2024 Apr 23.

Impact of prior lenalidomide or proteasome inhibitor exposure on the effectiveness of ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: A pooled analysis from the INSURE study

Affiliations

Impact of prior lenalidomide or proteasome inhibitor exposure on the effectiveness of ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: A pooled analysis from the INSURE study

Hans C Lee et al. Eur J Haematol. 2024 Aug.

Abstract

Objectives: To characterize the impact of prior exposure and refractoriness to lenalidomide or proteasome inhibitors (PIs) on the effectiveness and safety of ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (IRd) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).

Methods: INSURE is a pooled analysis of adult RRMM patients who had received IRd in ≥2 line of therapy from three studies: INSIGHT MM, UVEA-IXA, and REMIX.

Results: Overall, 391/100/68 were lenalidomide-naïve/-exposed/-refractory and 37/411/110 were PI-naïve/-exposed/-refractory. Median duration of therapy (DOT) was 15.3/15.6/4.7 months and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 21.6/25.8/5.6 months in lenalidomide-naïve/exposed/refractory patients. Median DOT and PFS in PI-naïve/exposed/refractory patients were 20.4/15.2/6.9 months and not reached/19.8/11.4 months, respectively. The proportion of lenalidomide-naïve/exposed/refractory patients in INSIGHT and UVEA-IXA who discontinued a study drug due to adverse events (AEs) was ixazomib, 31.6/28.2/28.0% and 18.6/6.7/10.5%; lenalidomide, 21.9/28.2/16.0% and 16.1/6.7/10.5%; dexamethasone, 18.4/20.5/16.0% and 10.6/0/10.5%, respectively. The proportion of PI-naïve/exposed/refractory patients in INSIGHT and UVEA-IXA who discontinued a study drug due to AEs was: ixazomib, 44.4/28.8/27.8% and 22.2/16.7/15.7%; lenalidomide, 33.3/22.0/19.4% and 16.7/15.9/11.8%; dexamethasone, 33.3/17.4/16.7% and 16.7/9.5/7.8%, respectively. REMIX AE discontinuation rates were unavailable.

Conclusion: IRd appeared to be effective in RRMM patients in routine clinical practice regardless of prior lenalidomide or PI exposure, with better outcomes seen in lenalidomide- and/or PI-nonrefractory versus refractory patients.

Keywords: effectiveness; ixazomib; lenalidomide; multiple myeloma; prior treatment exposure; proteasome inhibitor; relapsed/refractory.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

REFERENCES

    1. NINLARO. US Prescribing Information. NINLARO; 2022 Accessed January 2023. https://www.ninlaro.com/prescribing-information.pdf
    1. European Medicines Agency. Summary of Product Characteristics. European Medicines Agency; 2023 Accessed February 2024. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product‐information/ninlaro‐epar‐...
    1. Moreau P, Masszi T, Grzasko N, et al. Oral ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(17):1621‐1634.
    1. Puig N, Abonour R, Davies FE, et al. Real‐world duration of treatment (DOT) with lenalidomide‐dexamethasone (rd)‐based regimens in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): outcomes from the global INSIGHT MM study. HemaSphere. 2021;5(Suppl 2):463.
    1. Ludwig H, Terpos E, Mateos M‐V, et al. Effectiveness and safety of ixazomib‐based therapy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM) outside of a clinical trial: final analysis of the ‘use via early access to ixazomib’ (UVEA IXA) study. HemaSphere. 2021;5(Suppl 2):468.

MeSH terms