Domains, competences and learning outcomes for undergraduate education in periodontology
- PMID: 38655768
- DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.13991
Domains, competences and learning outcomes for undergraduate education in periodontology
Abstract
Aim: This review is intended to adapt the current conceptual framework in dental education based on four domains to propose a set of competences, learning outcomes and methods of teaching, learning and assessment for undergraduate education in periodontology.
Review: Based on the current framework of competences and learning outcomes recommended by the Association for Dental Education in Europe (ADEE), undergraduate education in periodontology has been updated using the classification and clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of periodontal and peri-implant diseases.
Conclusions: Specific learning outcomes have been proposed within each competence area, that is in Domain I (n = 10), Domain II (n = 13), Domain III (n = 33) and Domain IV (n = 12). Teaching methods and learning activities based on the different dimensions of the cognitive process have been proposed. Additionally, 10 key learning outcomes have been proposed as exit outcomes, which implies their accomplishment within the final assessment of any graduating student.
Keywords: curriculum; dental education; learning outcomes; periodontology; undergraduate.
© 2024 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Periodontology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Adam, S. (2004). Using learning outcomes: A consideration of the nature, role, application and implications for European education of employing ‘learning outcomes’ at the local, national and international levels (Report June 2004). United Kingdom Bologna Seminar, Heriot‐Watt University, Edinburgh (Scotland). https://ehea.info/media.ehea.info/file/Learning_Outcomes_Edinburgh_2004/...
-
- American Association of Dental Schools/American Association of Dental Education (AADS/ADEA). (1997). Competencies for the new dentist. Journal of Dental Education, 61, 556–558.
-
- Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives: complete edition. New York: Longman.
-
- Berglundh, T., Armitage, G., Araujo, M. G., Avila‐Ortiz, G., Blanco, J., Camargo, P. M., Chen, S., Cochran, D., Derks, J., Figuero, E., Hämmerle, C. H. F., Heitz‐Mayfiel, L. J. A., Huynh‐Ba, G., Iacono, V., Koo, K. T., Lambert, F., McCauley, L., Quirynen, M., Renvert, S., … Zitzmann, N. (2018). Peri‐implant diseases and conditions: Consensus report of workgroup 4 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri‐Implant Diseases and Conditions. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 45(suppl 20), 286–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12957
-
- Biggs, J. (1999). What the student does: Teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 18(1), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436990180105
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
