Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep;116(3):795-806.
doi: 10.1002/cpt.3274. Epub 2024 Apr 24.

Leveraging QSP Models for MIPD: A Case Study for Warfarin/INR

Affiliations

Leveraging QSP Models for MIPD: A Case Study for Warfarin/INR

Undine Falkenhagen et al. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2024 Sep.

Erratum in

Abstract

Warfarin dosing remains challenging due to substantial inter-individual variability, which can lead to unsafe or ineffective therapy with standard dosing. Model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) can help individualize warfarin dosing, requiring the selection of a suitable model. For models developed from clinical data, the dependence on the study design and population raises questions about generalizability. Quantitative system pharmacology (QSP) models promise better extrapolation abilities; however, their complexity and lack of validation on clinical data raise questions about applicability in MIPD. We have previously derived a mechanistic warfarin/international normalized ratio (INR) model from a blood coagulation QSP model. In this article, we evaluated the predictive performance of the warfarin/INR model in the context of MIPD using an external dataset with INR data from patients starting warfarin treatment. We assessed the accuracy and precision of model predictions, benchmarked against an empirically based reference model. Additionally, we evaluated covariate contributions and assessed the predictive performance separately in the more challenging outpatient data. The warfarin/INR model performed comparably to the reference model across various measures despite not being calibrated with warfarin initiation data. Including CYP2C9 and/or VKORC1 genotypes as covariates improved the prediction quality of the warfarin/INR model, even after assimilating 4 days of INR data. The outpatient INR exhibited higher unexplained variability, and predictions slightly exceeded observed values, suggesting that model adjustments might be necessary when transitioning from an inpatient to an outpatient setting. Overall, this research underscores the potential of QSP-derived models for MIPD, offering a complementary approach to empirical model development.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Johnson, J. et al. Clinical Pharmacogenetics implementation consortium (CPIC) guideline for Pharmacogenetics‐guided warfarin dosing: 2017 update. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 102, 397–404 (2017).
    1. Gage, B.F. et al. Effect of genotype‐guided warfarin dosing on clinical events and anticoagulation control among patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty. JAMA 318, 1115–1124 (2017).
    1. Pirmohamed, M. et al. A randomized trial of genotype‐guided dosing of warfarin. N. Engl. J. Med. 369, 2294–2303 (2013).
    1. Gage, B. et al. Use of Pharmacogenetic and clinical factors to predict the therapeutic dose of warfarin. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 84, 326–331 (2008).
    1. The International Warfarin Pharmacogenetics Consortium. Estimation of the warfarin dose with clinical and Pharmacogenetic data. N. Engl. J. Med. 360, 753–764 (2009).

LinkOut - more resources