Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 24;24(1):268.
doi: 10.1186/s12887-024-04758-3.

Parents' and neonatal healthcare professionals' views on barriers and facilitators to parental presence in the neonatal unit: a qualitative study

Stephanie Vanessa Schmid #  1   2 , Christine Arnold #  3 , Sophie Jaisli  1 , Benedikt Bubl  1 , Erika Harju  2   4 , André Kidszun  1
Affiliations

Parents' and neonatal healthcare professionals' views on barriers and facilitators to parental presence in the neonatal unit: a qualitative study

Stephanie Vanessa Schmid et al. BMC Pediatr. .

Abstract

Background: Parent and infant separation in the neonatal unit is associated with adverse health outcomes. Family-integrated care has several advantages and the potential to reduce these adverse outcomes but requires parental presence. This study aimed to explore the views of parents and neonatal healthcare professionals (nHCPs) on barriers and facilitators to parental presence in a Swiss neonatal unit and to identify possible differences between nHCPs and parents, and between mothers and fathers.

Methods: Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with parents and focus group discussions with nHCPs. Inductive content analysis was used to identify barriers and facilitators to parental presence in the neonatal unit.

Results: Twenty parents (10 mothers and 10 fathers) and 21 nHCPs (10 nurses and 11 physicians) participated in the study. Parents and nHCPs experienced barriers and facilitators related to: (1) Structural factors of the institution, such as infrastructure or travel and distance to the neonatal unit. (2) Organization and time management of parental presence, daily activities, and work. (3) Resources, which include factors related to the legal situation, support services, family, and friends. (4) Physical and psychological aspects, such as pain, which mainly affected mothers, and aspects of emotional distress, which affected both parents. Self-care was an important physical and psychological facilitator. (5) Parent-professional interaction. Parental presence was influenced by communication, relationship, and interaction in infant care; and (6) Cultural aspects and language. Some perspectives differed between mothers and fathers, while the overall views of parents and nHCPs provided complementary rather than conflicting insights. Using visit plans to support the organization, educating nHCPs in knowledge skills and available resources to improve encouragement and information to parents, strengthening parent self-care, and improving nHCPs' attitudes towards parental presence were seen as possible improvements.

Conclusions: Multifactorial barriers and facilitators determine parental presence and experience in the neonatal unit. Parents and nHCPs made specific recommendations to improve parental presence.

Keywords: Barriers; Facilitators; Neonatal unit; Parental presence; Parents; Preterm infant.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Barriers and facilitators to parental presence. –: barrier; +: facilitator; >: suggestion for improvement; m: affect mothers; f: affect fathers; O: mentioned by parents; :mentioned by nHCPs; KMC: Kangaroo Mother Care; nHCPs: neonatal healthcare professionals
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Perin J, Mulick A, Yeung D, Villavicencio F, Lopez G, Strong KL, et al. Global, regional, and national causes of under-5 mortality in 2000–19: an updated systematic analysis with implications for the Sustainable Development Goals. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2022;6(2):106–15. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(21)00311-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Henderson J, Carson C, Redshaw M. Impact of preterm birth on maternal well-being and women’s perceptions of their baby: a population-based survey. BMJ Open. 2016;6(10):e012676. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012676. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pace CC, Spittle AJ, Molesworth CML, Lee KJ, Northam EA, Cheong JLY, et al. Evolution of depression and anxiety symptoms in parents of very Preterm infants during the Newborn Period. JAMA Pediatr. 2016;170(9):863–70. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.0810. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Woodward LJ, Bora S, Clark CAC, Montgomery-Hönger A, Pritchard VE, Spencer C, et al. Very preterm birth: maternal experiences of the neonatal intensive care environment. J Perinatol. 2014;34(7):555–61. doi: 10.1038/jp.2014.43. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bergman NJ. Birth practices: maternal-neonate separation as a source of toxic stress. Birth Defects Res. 2019;111(15):1087–109. doi: 10.1002/bdr2.1530. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types