Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 24;24(1):518.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10916-1.

Cancer care coordination in rural Hawaii: a focus group study

Shin Chang  1   2 , Michelle Liu  2 , Christa Braun-Inglis  2 , Randall Holcombe  2   3 , Izumi Okado  4
Affiliations

Cancer care coordination in rural Hawaii: a focus group study

Shin Chang et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Rural populations consistently experience a disproportionate burden of cancer, including higher incidence and mortality rates, compared to the urban populations. Factors that are thought to contribute to these disparities include limited or lack of access to care and challenges with care coordination (CC). In Hawaii, many patients residing in rural areas experience unique challenges with CC as they require inter-island travel for their cancer treatment. In this focus group study, we explored the specific challenges and positive experiences that impact the CC in rural Hawaii cancer patients.

Methods: We conducted two semi-structured focus group interviews with cancer patients receiving active treatment for any type of cancer (n = 8). The participants were recruited from the rural areas of Hawaii, specifically the Hawaii county and Kauai. Rural was defined using the Rural-Urban Commuting Area Codes (RUCA; rural ≥ 4). The focus group discussions were facilitated using open-ended questions to explore patients' experiences with CC.

Results: Content analysis revealed that 47% of the discussions were related to CC-related challenges, including access to care (27.3%), insurance (9.1%), inter-island travel (6.1%), and medical literacy (4.5%). Other major themes from the discussions focused on facilitators of CC (30.3%), including the use of electronic patient portal (12.1%), team-based approach (9.1%), family caregiver support (4.5%), and local clinic staff (4.5%).

Conclusion: Our findings indicate that there are notable challenges in rural patients' experiences regarding their cancer care coordination. Specific factors such as the lack of oncologist and oncology services, fragmented system, and the lack of local general medical providers contribute to problems with access to care. However, there are also positive factors found through the help of facilitators of CC, notability the use of electronic patient portal, team-based approach, family caregiver support, and local clinic staff. These findings highlight potential targets of interventions to improve cancer care delivery for rural patients.

Trial registration: Not required.

Keywords: Cancer; Care coordination; Focus group; Qualitative study; Rural Hawaii.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
A & B Themes and subthemes, shown by proportions of focus group discussion
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Henley SJ, Anderson RN, Thomas CC, Massetti GM, Peaker B, Richardson LC, Invasive Cancer I. 2004–2013, and deaths, 2006–2015, in Nonmetropolitan and Metropolitan counties — United States. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2017;66(14):1–13. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6614a1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Henley SJ, Jemal A. Rural cancer control: bridging the chasm in geographic health inequity. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2018;27(11):1248–51. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-0807. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blake KD, Moss JL, Gaysynsky A, Srinivasan S, Croyle RT. Making the case for investment in Rural Cancer Control: an analysis of Rural Cancer incidence, mortality, and Funding trends. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017;26(7):992–7. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0092. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McDonald KM, Sundaram V, Bravata DM, Lewis R, Lin N, Kraft SA et al. Closing the Quality Gap: A Critical Analysis of Quality Improvement Strategies (Vol. 7: Care Coordination) [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2007 [cited 2023 Jun 18]. (AHRQ Technical Reviews). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK44015/. - PubMed
    1. Walsh J, Harrison JD, Young JM, Butow PN, Solomon MJ, Masya L. What are the current barriers to effective cancer care coordination? A qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10(1):132. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-132. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types