Alternative splicing as a driver of natural variation in abscisic acid response
- PMID: 38659400
- DOI: 10.1111/tpj.16773
Alternative splicing as a driver of natural variation in abscisic acid response
Abstract
Abscisic acid (ABA) is a crucial player in plant responses to the environment. It accumulates under stress, activating downstream signaling to implement molecular responses that restore homeostasis. Natural variance in ABA sensitivity remains barely understood, and the ABA pathway has been mainly studied at the transcriptional level, despite evidence that posttranscriptional regulation, namely, via alternative splicing, contributes to plant stress tolerance. Here, we identified the Arabidopsis accession Kn-0 as less sensitive to ABA than the reference Col-0, as shown by reduced effects of the hormone on seedling establishment, root branching, and stomatal closure, as well as by decreased induction of ABA marker genes. An in-depth comparative transcriptome analysis of the ABA response in the two variants revealed lower expression changes and fewer genes affected for the least ABA-sensitive ecotype. Notably, Kn-0 exhibited reduced levels of the ABA-signaling SnRK2 protein kinases and lower basal expression of ABA-reactivation genes, consistent with our finding that Kn-0 contains less endogenous ABA than Col-0. ABA also markedly affected alternative splicing, primarily intron retention, with Kn-0 being less responsive regarding both the number and magnitude of alternative splicing events, particularly exon skipping. We find that alternative splicing introduces a more ecotype-specific layer of ABA regulation and identify ABA-responsive splicing changes in key ABA pathway regulators that provide a functional and mechanistic link to the differential sensitivity of the two ecotypes. Our results offer new insight into the natural variation of ABA responses and corroborate a key role for alternative splicing in implementing ABA-mediated stress responses.
Keywords: Arabidopsis thaliana; SnRK2; abscisic acid; alternative splicing; gene expression; natural variation.
© 2024 The Authors. The Plant Journal published by Society for Experimental Biology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Aalto, M.K., Helenius, E., Kariola, T., Pennanen, V., Heino, P., Hõrak, H. et al. (2012) ERD15—an attenuator of plant ABA responses and stomatal aperture. Plant Science, 182, 19–28.
-
- Albuquerque‐Martins, R., Díez, A.R., Szakonyi, D. & Duque, P. (2022) Assessing postgermination development in Arabidopsis thaliana under abiotic stress. Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2494, 207–215.
-
- Ali, A., Pardo, J.M. & Yun, D.‐J. (2020) Desensitization of ABA‐signaling: the swing from activation to degradation. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11, 379.
-
- AlShareef, S., Ling, Y., Butt, H., Mariappan, K.G., Benhamed, M. & Mahfouz, M.M. (2017) Herboxidiene triggers splicing repression and abiotic stress responses in plants. BMC Genomics, 18, 260.
-
- Assmann, S.M. (2013) Natural variation in abiotic stress and climate change responses in Arabidopsis: implications for twenty‐first‐century agriculture. International Journal of Plant Sciences, 174, 3–26.
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Molecular Biology Databases
