Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Apr 10:12:1279112.
doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1279112. eCollection 2024.

Current genetic diagnostics in inborn errors of immunity

Affiliations
Review

Current genetic diagnostics in inborn errors of immunity

Sandra von Hardenberg et al. Front Pediatr. .

Abstract

New technologies in genetic diagnostics have revolutionized the understanding and management of rare diseases. This review highlights the significant advances and latest developments in genetic diagnostics in inborn errors of immunity (IEI), which encompass a diverse group of disorders characterized by defects in the immune system, leading to increased susceptibility to infections, autoimmunity, autoinflammatory diseases, allergies, and malignancies. Various diagnostic approaches, including targeted gene sequencing panels, whole exome sequencing, whole genome sequencing, RNA sequencing, or proteomics, have enabled the identification of causative genetic variants of rare diseases. These technologies not only facilitated the accurate diagnosis of IEI but also provided valuable insights into the underlying molecular mechanisms. Emerging technologies, currently mainly used in research, such as optical genome mapping, single cell sequencing or the application of artificial intelligence will allow even more insights in the aetiology of hereditary immune defects in the near future. The integration of genetic diagnostics into clinical practice significantly impacts patient care. Genetic testing enables early diagnosis, facilitating timely interventions and personalized treatment strategies. Additionally, establishing a genetic diagnosis is necessary for genetic counselling and prognostic assessments. Identifying specific genetic variants associated with inborn errors of immunity also paved the way for the development of targeted therapies and novel therapeutic approaches. This review emphasizes the challenges related with genetic diagnosis of rare diseases and provides future directions, specifically focusing on IEI. Despite the tremendous progress achieved over the last years, several obstacles remain or have become even more important due to the increasing amount of genetic data produced for each patient. This includes, first and foremost, the interpretation of variants of unknown significance (VUS) in known IEI genes and of variants in genes of unknown significance (GUS). Although genetic diagnostics have significantly contributed to the understanding and management of IEI and other rare diseases, further research, exchange between experts from different clinical disciplines, data integration and the establishment of comprehensive guidelines are crucial to tackle the remaining challenges and maximize the potential of genetic diagnostics in the field of rare diseases, such as IEI.

Keywords: genes of unknown significance; inborn errors of immunity; next-generation sequencing; technologies in genetic diagnostics; variants of unknown significance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overview of the most commonly used genetic technologies. In the field of genetic diagnostics, Sanger sequencing, panel diagnostics, whole exome sequencing, and whole genome sequencing have recently been employed as technologies. Additionally, in research settings, optical genome mapping (OGM), RNA sequencing (RNA-seq), proteomics, single cell sequencing, and epigenomics are additionally used in research settings. Figure created with Biorender.com.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Genematcher approach. Web based tools like GeneMatcher are used to share information about phenotypes of patients with IEI and the results of WGS analysis. GeneMatcher informs researchers about a “match”—same gene was uploaded by others—that allows them to get in touch, to exchange about phenotypes and results and to collaborate for further analysis of potential disease-causing genes. Figure created with Biorender.com.

References

    1. Seidel MG, Kindle G, Gathmann B, Quinti I, Buckland M, van Montfrans J, et al. The European society for immunodeficiencies (ESID) registry working definitions for the clinical diagnosis of inborn errors of immunity. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. (2019) 7(6):1763–70. 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.02.004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Watson JD, Crick FH. Molecular structure of nucleic acids; a structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid. Nature. (1953) 171(4356):737–8. 10.1038/171737a0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rudkin GT, Stollar BD. High resolution detection of DNA-RNA hybrids in situ by indirect immunofluorescence. Nature. (1977) 265(5593):472–3. 10.1038/265472a0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Solinas-Toldo S, Lampel S, Stilgenbauer S, Nickolenko J, Benner A, Dohner H, et al. Matrix-based comparative genomic hybridization: biochips to screen for genomic imbalances. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. (1997) 20(4):399–407. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2264(199712)20:4<399::AID-GCC12>3.0.CO;2-I - DOI - PubMed
    1. Peters KF, Menaker TJ, Wilson PL, Hadley DW. The human genome project: an update. Cancer Nurs. (2001) 24(4):287–92; quiz 292–283. 10.1097/00002820-200108000-00007 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources