Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
[Preprint]. 2024 Nov 11:2024.04.15.589192.
doi: 10.1101/2024.04.15.589192.

Pharmacological inhibition of astrocytic transglutaminase 2 facilitates the expression of a neurosupportive astrocyte reactive phenotype in association with increased histone acetylation

Affiliations

Pharmacological inhibition of astrocytic transglutaminase 2 facilitates the expression of a neurosupportive astrocyte reactive phenotype in association with increased histone acetylation

Thomas Delgado et al. bioRxiv. .

Update in

Abstract

Astrocytes play critical roles in supporting structural and metabolic homeostasis in the central nervous system (CNS). CNS injury leads to the development of a range of reactive phenotypes in astrocytes whose molecular determinants are poorly understood. Finding ways to modulate astrocytic injury responses and leverage a pro-recovery phenotype holds promise in treating CNS injury. Recently, it has been demonstrated that ablation of astrocytic transglutaminase 2 (TG2) modulates the phenotype of reactive astrocytes in a way that improves neuronal injury outcomes both in vitro and in vivo. In an in vivo mouse model, pharmacological inhibition of TG2 with the irreversible inhibitor VA4 phenocopies the neurosupportive effects of TG2 deletion in astrocytes. In this study, we provide insights into the mechanisms by which TG2 deletion or inhibition result in a more neurosupportive astrocytic phenotype. Using a neuron-astrocyte co-culture model, we show that VA4 treatment improves the ability of astrocytes to support neurite outgrowth on an injury-relevant matrix. To better understand how pharmacologically altering TG2 affects its ability to regulate reactive astrocyte phenotypes, we assessed how VA4 inhibition impacts TG2's interaction with Zbtb7a, a transcription factor we have previously identified as a functionally relevant TG2 nuclear interactor. The results of these studies demonstrate that VA4 significantly decreases the interaction of TG2 and Zbtb7a. TG2's interactions with Zbtb7a, as well as a wide range of other transcription factors and chromatin regulatory proteins, suggest that TG2 may act as an epigenetic regulator to modulate gene expression. To begin to understand if TG2-mediated epigenetic modification may impact astrocytic phenotypes in our models, we interrogated the effect of TG2 deletion and VA4 treatment on histone acetylation and found significantly greater acetylation in both experimental groups. Consistent with these findings, previous RNA-sequencing and our present proteomic analysis also supported a predominant transcriptionally suppressive role of TG2 in astrocytes. Our proteomic data additionally unveiled pronounced changes in lipid and antioxidant metabolism in astrocytes with TG2 deletion or inhibition, which likely contribute to the enhanced neurosupportive function of these astrocytes.

Keywords: Astrocytes; Histone modification; Neurosupportive phenotype; TG2.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
VA4 inhibition of TG2 facilitates the ability of WT astrocytes to promote neurite outgrowth on a chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan (CSPG) growth-inhibitory matrix. (a) Schematic of neurite outgrowth experimental paradigm including VA4 treatment. Created with BioRender.com. (b) Representative images of MAP2 staining of neurons without paired astrocytes, neurons paired with vehicle (DMSO)-treated astrocytes, or neurons paired with VA4-treated astrocytes (scale bar = 20 μm). (c) Quantification of length of longest neurite for neuron experimental groups on CSPG matrix. Shown as Mean and SEM (n= 86–111 neurons per group from two biological replicates, Kruskal Wallis Test **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Irreversible inhibition of TG2 with the drug VA4 reduces interaction between TG2 and Zbtb7a. (a) Input controls of V5-TG2 and FLAG-Zbtb7a transfected into HEK 293TN cells treated with VA4 or vehicle control (DMSO). (b) Immunoprecipitation of V5-TG2 pulls down less FLAG-Zbtb7a in cell lysates that were treated with VA4. In (a) and (b) the position at which molecular weight markers (kDa) migrated is indicated at the left of the immunoblots. (c) Quantification of the amount of FLAG-Zbtb7a pulled down normalized to the amount of V5-TG2 immunoprecipitated. Treatment of cells with VA4 resulted in a significant reduction in the Zbtb7a co-immunoprecipitated with TG2 compared to DMSO control. Shown as mean and SEM (n=5 samples per condition from 4 independent biological replicates, unpaired t-test ***p < 0.001).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
TG2−/− astrocytes have significantly greater acetylation of histone H3 at lysine residue 9 (H3K9ac) compared to WT astrocytes. (a) Representative western blot of WT and TG2−/− astrocyte lysates probed for Histone H3 acetylated at lysine residue 9 (H3K9ac). The position at which molecular weight markers (kDa) migrated is indicated at the left of the immunoblots. (b) Quantification of H3K9ac levels in WT and TG2−/− astrocytes. TG2−/− astrocytes showed significantly greater acetylation of H3K9 than WT astrocytes (~60%). Shown as mean and SEM (n=1–4 samples per condition from 4 independent biological replicates, unpaired t-test **p< 0.01).
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
WT astrocytes treated with VA4 show significantly greater H3K9 acetylation compared to DMSO vehicle control treated WT astrocytes. (a) Western blot of 10 μM VA4- and DMSO-treated WT astrocyte lysates probed for H3K9ac. The position at which molecular weight markers (kDa) migrated is indicated at the left of the immunoblots. (b) Quantification of H3K9ac levels showed significantly greater acetylation in VA4-treated WT astrocytes compared to DMSO-treated WT astrocytes (~65%). Shown as Mean and SEM (n=3 samples per condition from 2 independent biological replicates, unpaired t-test *p< 0.01).
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
TG2−/− and VA4-treated astrocytes share significant alterations in proteins associated with lipid metabolic and antioxidant pathways. (a) Volcano plot of significant differentially regulated proteins comparing TG2−/− to WT astrocyte cultures (n=5 samples per condition from 1 biological replicate) with thresholds set for log2 fold changes at +/− 0.5 and for adjusted p value < 0.05, and (b) DAVID GO Biological Process analysis of up- and down-regulated proteins. (c) Volcano plot of significant differentially regulated proteins comparing VA4-treated to DMSO-treated WT astrocyte cultures (n=6 samples per condition from 2 independent biological replicates) with thresholds set as above, and (d) DAVID GO Biological Process analysis of up- and downregulated proteins. (e-f) Enrichr transcription factor enrichment of up- and down-regulated proteins in (e) TG2−/− astrocytes (f) VA4-treated astrocytes. (g) Venn diagram showing overlap of significant differentially regulated proteins in both TG2−/− and VA4 datasets.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Proposed mechanism by which TG2 modulates the neuroprotective phenotype of reactive astrocytes. In stressed astrocytes, TG2 is able to move in and out of the nucleus. While in the nucleus, TG2 can interact with Zbtb7a and Sin3a, resulting in increased histone deacetylase (HDAC) activity and neurosupportive gene repression. If TG2 is deleted from the astrocytes, or the astrocytes are treated with VA4, the recruitment of Zbtb7a/Sin3a/HDAC to the DNA is diminished, resulting in de-repression of neurosupportive genes leading to a more neurosupportive phenotype. The “?” indicates that the effect of VA4 treatment on the nuclear/cytosolic localization of TG2 is unclear. Created with BioRender.com.

References

    1. Sofroniew M.V.; Vinters H.V. Astrocytes: biology and pathology. Acta Neuropathol 2010, 119, 7–35, doi: 10.1007/s00401-009-0619-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chung W.S.; Allen N.J.; Eroglu C. Astrocytes Control Synapse Formation, Function, and Elimination. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2015, 7, a020370, doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a020370. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barres B.A. The mystery and magic of glia: a perspective on their roles in health and disease. Neuron 2008, 60, 430–440, doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.10.013. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anderson M.A.; Ao Y.; Sofroniew M.V. Heterogeneity of reactive astrocytes. Neurosci Lett 2014, 565, 23–29, doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2013.12.030. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burda J.E.; O’Shea T.M.; Ao Y.; Suresh K.B.; Wang S.; Bernstein A.M.; Chandra A.; Deverasetty S.; Kawaguchi R.; Kim J.H.; et al. Divergent transcriptional regulation of astrocyte reactivity across disorders. Nature 2022, 606, 557–564, doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04739-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types