Bispecific antibodies for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: updates and future perspectives
- PMID: 38660139
- PMCID: PMC11039948
- DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1394048
Bispecific antibodies for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: updates and future perspectives
Abstract
Patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) that are refractory to the five most active anti-MM drugs, so-called penta-refractory MM, have historically had dismal outcomes with subsequent therapies. Progressive immune dysfunction, particularly of the T-cell repertoire, is implicated in the development of disease progression and refractory disease. However, the advent of novel immunotherapies such as bispecific antibodies are rapidly changing the treatment landscape and improving the survival outcomes of patients with RRMM. Bispecific antibodies are antibodies that are engineered to simultaneously engage cytotoxic immune effector cells (T cells or NK cells) and malignant plasma cells via binding to immune effector cell antigens and extracellular plasma cell antigens leading to immune effector cell activation and malignant plasma cell destruction. Currently, bispecific antibodies that bind CD3 on T cells and plasma cell epitopes such as B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA), G-protein coupled receptor family C group 5 member D (GPRC5d), and Fc receptor homologue 5 (FcRH5) are the most advanced in clinical development and are showing unprecedented response rates in patients with RRMM, including patients with penta-refractory disease. In this review article, we explore the available clinical data of bispecific antibodies in RRMM and summarize the efficacy, safety, toxicity, clinical outcomes, mechanisms of resistance, and future directions of these therapies in patients with RRMM.
Keywords: T-cell engagers; T-cell redirecting therapy; bispecific antibodies; immunotherapy; multiple myeloma.
Copyright © 2024 Parrondo, Ailawadhi and Cerchione.
Conflict of interest statement
RP serves on the advisory board for Sanofi Aventis and AstraZeneca and has received research funding from GlaxoSmithKline and the Bristol Myers Squibb Foundation. SA has provided consultancy for Celgene, Amgen, Janssen and Takeda, and has received research funding from Pharmacyclics, Cellectar and Janssen. The remaining author declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Figures
References
-
- Gill SK, Unawane R, Wang S, Aleman A, Serna M, Perez-Manon F, et al. . Inferior outcomes of patients with quad and penta-refractory multiple myeloma (MM) compared to those of patients who have been quad and penta exposed. Blood. (2021) 138:4742. doi: 10.1182/blood-2021-153556 - DOI
Publication types
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials