Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 10:12:1334279.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1334279. eCollection 2024.

Community health worker perspectives on advocacy: design-based research to develop a digital advocacy training course

Nophiwe Job  1 , Jamie Sewan Johnston  2 , Carey Westgate  3 , Nadine Ann Skinner  2 , Victoria Ward  2   4 , Madeleine Ballard  3   5 ; CHW Advisory Group
Affiliations

Community health worker perspectives on advocacy: design-based research to develop a digital advocacy training course

Nophiwe Job et al. Front Public Health. .

Abstract

Introduction: While community health workers (CHWs) are well-positioned as health advocates, they frequently lack support and feel undervalued. Advocacy training may prepare CHWs to support communities better.

Methods: This study uses a design-based research approach to (1) explore how participation in curriculum-development workshops for a digital advocacy course influenced CHWs' (n = 25) perceptions of advocacy and (2) describe how CHW involvement shaped course development. Data were collected via five discussion groups and seven surveys over six months.

Results: Initially, the CHWs perceived themselves as community-advocates but not as self-advocates. They increasingly reflected on the merits of advocating for better working conditions and aspired to greater involvement in decision-making. CHWs reflected positively on their advisory role in shaping the course to improve content acceptability and validity.

Discussion: Training efforts to engage CHWs in advocacy must overcome systemic barriers and norms internalized by CHWs that deter them from reaching their full potential as advocates.

Keywords: CHWs; advocacy training; design-based research; digital training; health advocacy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Course infographic: ladder of participation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Screenshots of mobile application course interface.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Ingram M, Sabo S, Rothers J, Wennerstrom A, de Zapien JG. Community health workers and community advocacy: addressing health disparities. J Community Health. (2008) 33:417–24. doi: 10.1007/s10900-008-9111-y - DOI - PubMed
    1. Balcazar H, Rosenthal EL, Brownstein JN, Rush CH, Matos S, Hernandez L. Community health workers can be a public health force for change in the United States: three actions for a new paradigm. Am J Public Health. (2011) 101:2199–203. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300386, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sabo S, Wennerstrom A, Phillips D, Haywoord C, Redondo F, Bell ML, et al. . Community health worker professional advocacy: voices of action from the 2014 National Community Health Worker Advocacy Survey. J Ambul Care Manage. (2015) 38:225–35. doi: 10.1097/JAC.0000000000000089 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wennerstrom A, Silver J, Pollock M, Gustat J. Action to improve social determinants of health: outcomes of leadership and advocacy training for community residents. Health Promot Pract. (2022) 23:137–46. doi: 10.1177/1524839920956297, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ballard M, Johnson A, Mwanza I, Ngwira H, Schechter J, Odera M, et al. . Community health Workers in Pandemics: evidence and investment implications. Glob Health Sci Pract. (2022) 10:e2100648. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00648, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources