A Prognostic Methylation-Driven Two-Gene Signature in Medulloblastoma
- PMID: 38662144
- DOI: 10.1007/s12031-024-02203-9
A Prognostic Methylation-Driven Two-Gene Signature in Medulloblastoma
Abstract
Medulloblastoma (MB) is one of the most common pediatric brain tumors and it is estimated that one-third of patients will not achieve long-term survival. Conventional prognostic parameters have limited and unreliable correlations with MB outcome, presenting a major challenge for patients' clinical improvement. Acknowledging this issue, our aim was to build a gene signature and evaluate its potential as a new prognostic model for patients with the disease. In this study, we used six datasets totaling 1679 samples including RNA gene expression and DNA methylation data from primary MB as well as control samples from healthy cerebellum. We identified methylation-driven genes (MDGs) in MB, genes whose expression is correlated with their methylation. We employed LASSO regression, incorporating the MDGs as a parameter to develop the prognostic model. Through this approach, we derived a two-gene signature (GS-2) of candidate prognostic biomarkers for MB (CEMIP and NCBP3). Using a risk score model, we confirmed the GS-2 impact on overall survival (OS) with Kaplan-Meier analysis. We evaluated its robustness and accuracy with receiver operating characteristic curves predicting OS at 1, 3, and 5 years in multiple independent datasets. The GS-2 showed highly significant results as an independent prognostic biomarker compared to traditional MB markers. The methylation-regulated GS-2 risk score model can effectively classify patients with MB into high and low-risk, reinforcing the importance of this epigenetic modification in the disease. Such genes stand out as promising prognostic biomarkers with potential application for MB treatment.
Keywords: DNA methylation; Medulloblastoma; Precision medicine; Prognostic biomarker.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Aryee MJ, Jaffe AE, Corrada-Bravo H et al (2014) Minfi: a flexible and comprehensive Bioconductor package for the analysis of Infinium DNA methylation microarrays. Bioinformatics 30:1363–1369. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu049 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Baltz AG, Munschauer M, Schwanhäusser B et al (2012) The mRNA-bound proteome and its global occupancy profile on protein-coding transcripts. Mol Cell 46:674–690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2012.05.021 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J Roy Stat Soc: Ser B (Methodol) 57:289–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x - DOI
-
- Biegel JA, Janss AJ, Raffel C et al (1997) Prognostic significance of chromosome 17p deletions in childhood primitive neuroectodermal tumors (medulloblastomas) of the central nervous system. Clin Cancer Res 3:473–478 - PubMed
-
- Birkenkamp-Demtroder K, Maghnouj A, Mansilla F et al (2011) Repression of KIAA1199 attenuates wnt-signalling and decreases the proliferation of colon cancer cells. Br J Cancer 105:552–561. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.268 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
- 406484/2022-8 (INCT BioOncoPed)/National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq, MCTI, Brazil)
- 406484/2022-8 (INCT BioOncoPed)/National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq, MCTI, Brazil)
- 312305/2021-4/Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous