Negotiating discord in sustainability transformations
- PMID: 38662571
- PMCID: PMC11127004
- DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2310186121
Negotiating discord in sustainability transformations
Abstract
Policy action for sustainability transformation faces inherent and ever-present sources of conflict, pushback, and resistance (i.e., discord). However, conceptual frameworks and policy prescriptions for sustainability transformations often reflect an undue image of accord. This involves simplified assumptions about consensus, steering, friction, discreteness, and additiveness of policy action, conferring an unrealistic view of the potential to deliberately realize transformation. Instead, negotiating discord through continuously finding partial political settlements among divided actors needs to become a key focus of policy action for sustainability transformations. Doing so can help to navigate deeply political settings through imperfect but workable steps that loosen deadlock, generate momentum for further policy action, and avoid complete derailment of transformation agendas when discord arises.
Keywords: conflict; governance; negotiation; political settlements; transformative change.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests statement:The authors declare no competing interest.
Figures



References
-
- Blythe J., et al. , The dark side of transformation: Latent risks in contemporary sustainability discourse. Antipode 50, 1206–1223 (2018).
-
- Patterson J., et al. , Exploring the governance and politics of transformations towards sustainability. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. 24, 1–16 (2017).
-
- Gupta J., et al. , Earth system justice needed to identify and live within Earth system boundaries. Nat. Sustain. 6, 630–638 (2023).
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources