Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2024 Aug;59(8):1084-1091.
doi: 10.1038/s41409-024-02282-7. Epub 2024 Apr 25.

Reduced intensity versus myeloablative conditioning for MDS: long-term results of an EBMT phase III study (RICMAC)

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Reduced intensity versus myeloablative conditioning for MDS: long-term results of an EBMT phase III study (RICMAC)

Christian Niederwieser et al. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2024 Aug.

Abstract

Short-term outcome of myeloablative (MAC) and reduced intensity (RIC) conditioning in the prospective randomized international EBMT RICMAC study in patients with myelodyplastic syndrome (MDS) was comparable but longer follow up is lacking. Patients with MDS aged 18-65 years were randomized to receive MAC (N = 64) with busulfan/cyclophosphamide or RIC (n = 65) with busulfan/fludarabine followed by stem cell transplantation -(HCT) from HLA matched or mismatched donor. After a median follow-up of 6.2 (0.4-12.5) years, 10-year OS and RFS were 54.0% and 43.9% for RIC and 44.4% and 44.2% for MAC (p = 0.15 and p = 0.78), respectively. Since the first report, 6 patients died on NRM, 4 after RIC, and 2 after MAC. Similarly, 8 patients relapsed (4 in each arm), increasing the number of relapsed patients to 28. The second HCT was performed in 18 pts, 8 in the MAC, and 10 in the RIC arm. In a multivariate analysis, ECOG status and chemotherapy prior to HCT were independent risk factors for OS and RFS, ECOG and low cytogenetic risk for NRM and chemotherapy prior to HCT for RI. Patients with low cytogenetic risk had better OS [p = 0.002], RFS [p = 0.02], and NRM (p = 0.015) after RIC as compared to MAC.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The study was funded in part by Pierre Fabre. NK received an honorarium from Novartis, Neovii, Riemser, and BMS. PD consultancy for AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Beigene, BMS, Gilead, Miltenyi, Novartis, Riemser; speakers’ bureau for AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, BMS, Gilead, Novartis, Riemser, Roche; research support from Riemser (all to institution). WB received Honoraries and Travel Grants from Medac, Miltenyi, BMS, Janssen, and Novartis. MR received research funding (independent studies) from AbbVie, Novartis, Medac, and Astex. LPM received an honorarium from Pfizer, Gilead Novartis, Amgen, Jazz, and Neovii.KH received research support from Celgene/BMS, Gilead, Incyte, Janssen, Roche, and Sanofi and honorarium from AbbVie, EUSA Pharma, Gilead, Incyte, Novartis, Roche, Beigene, Celgene/BMS, EUSA Pharma, Incyte, Roche, Sanofi. UP received honoraria from Abbvie, Celgene/Jazz, Curis, Geron, and Janssen for consulting or advisory roles from BMS GmbH & Co KG, Celgene/Jazz, and Novartis, research funding from Amgen, BerGenBio, Celgene, Curis, Janssen, and Novartis, and travel sponsoring, accommodations, and expenses from Celgene. DPM received honoraria/consultation fees from Novartis, Jazz Pharma, and partial participation in a company-sponsored bureau (AbbVie, CTI).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Initial analyses [5] versus updated analyses of overall survival of all patients (n = 129) recruited in the RICMAC study.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Outcome after MAC vs RIC in MDS/sAML.
Overall survival (a), relapse-free survival (b), relapse incidence (c), non-relapse mortality (d), and chronic GVHD incidence (e) according to treatment arm [myeloalative (MAC) versus reduced intensity conditioning (RIC)] from transplant.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Outcome after MAC vs RIC in MDS/sAM at landmark 12 months.
Overall survival (a), relapse-free survival (b), relapse incidence (c), non-relapse mortality (d), and chronic GVHD Incidence (e) according to treatment arm [myeloalative (MAC) versus reduced intensity conditioning (RIC)] as Landmark Analysis at 12 months.

References

    1. Ma X. Epidemiology of myelodysplastic syndromes. Am J Med. 2012;125(7 Suppl):S2–5. 10.1016/j.amjmed.2012.04.014. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Greenberg PL, Tuechler H, Schanz J, Sanz G, Garcia-Manero G, Sole F, et al. Revised international prognostic scoring system for myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. 2012;120:2454–65. 10.1182/blood-2012-03-420489 10.1182/blood-2012-03-420489 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kroger N, Iacobelli S, Franke GN, Platzbecker U, Uddin R, Hubel K, et al. Dose-reduced versus standard conditioning followed by allogeneic stem-cell transplantation for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome: a prospective randomized phase III study of the EBMT (RICMAC Trial). J Clin Oncol. 2017; JCO2016707349. 10.1200/JCO.2016.70.7349. - PubMed
    1. Shulman HM, Sullivan KM, Weiden PL, McDonald GB, Striker GE, Sale GE, et al. Chronic graft-versus-host syndrome in man: a long-term clinicopathologic study of 20 seattle patients. Am J Med. 1980;69:204–17. 10.1016/0002-9343(80)90380-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kroger N, Sockel K, Wolschke C, Bethge W, Schlenk RF, Wolf D et al. Comparison between 5-azacytidine treatment and allogeneic stem-cell transplantation in elderly patients with advanced MDS according to donor availability (VidazaAllo Study). J Clin Oncol. 2021: JCO2002724. 10.1200/JCO.20.02724. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms