A comparative study of the use of digital technology in the anterior smile experience
- PMID: 38664749
- PMCID: PMC11046787
- DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04228-3
A comparative study of the use of digital technology in the anterior smile experience
Abstract
Objectives: this study aims to compare the clinical outcomes of traditional and digital crown extension guides in the aesthetic restoration of anterior teeth. Additionally, the study will analyze the differences in the results of various digital crown extension guides in anterior aesthetic restorations.
Methods: Sixty-two patients who required aesthetic restoration of their anterior teeth were selected for this study. The patients had a total of 230 anterior teeth and were randomly divided into three groups: a control group of 22 cases who received diagnostic wax-up with pressure film, an experimental group 1 of 20 cases who received 3D printed digital models with pressure film, and an experimental group 2 of 20 patients who received digital dual-positioning guides. The control group had a total of 84 anterior teeth, experimental group 1 had 72 anterior teeth, and experimental group 2 had 74 anterior teeth. The study compared three methods for fabricating crown extension guides: the control group used the diagnostic wax-up plus compression film method, while experimental group 1 used compression film on 3D printed models and experimental group 2 used 3D printed digital dual-positioning crown extension guides. After the crown lengthening surgery, the control group patients wore DMG resin temporary crown material for gingival contouring, while the experimental group patients wore 3D printed resin temporary crowns for the same purpose. The patients were followed up in the outpatient clinic after wearing temporary crowns for 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months, respectively. The clinical results were evaluated in terms of marginal fit, red aesthetic index, and white aesthetic index.
Results: Based on the statistical analysis, the experimental group required significantly fewer follow-up visits and less time for guide design and fabrication compared to the control group. Additionally, the surgical time for the experimental group was significantly shorter than that of the control group. During the postoperative period between the 1st and 3rd month, the PES index scores for the marginal gingival level, proximal, and distal mesiodistal gingival papillae of the experimental group showed a trend of superiority over those of the control group. By the 6th month, the marginal gingival level exhibited a significant difference between the experimental and control groups. The experimental group demonstrated superior results to the control group in terms of shape, contour, and volume of the teeth, color, surface texture, and transparency of the restorations, and features during the 1st and 3rd postoperative months. In the 6th month, the comparative results indicated that the experimental group continued to exhibit superior outcomes to the control group in terms of the shape, color, surface texture, and transparency of the restorations, as well as the characteristics of the teeth. Additionally, the experimental group demonstrated significantly fewer gingival alterations than the control group at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post-procedure, with this difference being statistically significant. Furthermore, the combination of 3D printing technology and restorative techniques was utilized, resulting in consistent patient satisfaction.
Conclusion: Digitalisation plays an important role in anterior aesthetic restorations. The use of digital technology to manage the entire process of anterior cosmetic restorations can improve restorative results, reduce the number of follow-up appointments, shorten consultation time, and achieve better patient satisfaction.
Keywords: 3D printing; Crown lengthening; Digital dual positioning guides; Digital smile design (DSD); Gingivoplasty.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Urumqi Stomatological Hospital (WKY-LS-2023–005) and written informed consent was obtained from all patients. And we will do our best to protect the rights and privacy of the subjects, and there is no conflict of interest in the content and results of the study.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures









Similar articles
-
[Application of 3D printed double positioning guide in aesthetic restoration of anterior teeth].Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2024 Dec;33(6):627-632. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2024. PMID: 40007294 Clinical Trial. Chinese.
-
[Evaluation of the effect of digital crown extension guide in aesthetic restoration of anterior teeth].Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2022 Jun;31(3):260-264. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2022. PMID: 36204953 Clinical Trial. Chinese.
-
Accuracy of trial restorations from virtual planning: A comparison of two fabrication techniques.J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Mar;127(3):425-429. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.08.040. Epub 2020 Dec 11. J Prosthet Dent. 2022. PMID: 33317829
-
Esthetic crown lengthening for maxillary anterior teeth.Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1997 Aug;18(8):807-12, 814-6, 818-9; quiz 820. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1997. PMID: 9533339 Review.
-
Surgical guides for esthetic crown lengthening procedures: Periodontal and prosthetic aspects.J Am Dent Assoc. 2022 Jan;153(1):31-38. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2021.07.005. Epub 2021 Sep 30. J Am Dent Assoc. 2022. PMID: 34602279 Review.
Cited by
-
Eco-Friendly Approaches to Enhance Dental Aesthetics and Patient Satisfactions Using Digital Smile Design: A Systematic Review.Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2025 Aug 25;17:391-404. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S535436. eCollection 2025. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2025. PMID: 40895222 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Balletti C, Ballarin M. Guerra F.3D printing: State of the art and future perspectives. J Cultural Heritage. 2017;26:172–182. doi: 10.1016/j.culher.2017.02.010. - DOI
-
- Lee JY, An J, Chua CK. Fundamentals and applications of 3D printing for novel materials. Appl Mater Today. 2017;7:120–133. doi: 10.1016/j.apmt.2017.02.004. - DOI
-
- Zotti F, Marchesini F, Lanzaretti G, et al. Traditional, 2D and 3D Workflows: what is better for aesthetic rehabilitation of superior anterior teeth? Appl Sci. 2023;13(10):6205. doi: 10.3390/app13106205. - DOI
-
- Belser UC, Grütter L, Vailati F, et al. Outcome evaluation of early placed maxillary anterior single-tooth implants using objective esthetic criteria: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45patients with a 2-to 4-year follow-up using pink and white esthetic scores. J Periodontol. 2009;80(1):140–151. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.080435. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources