Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 25;24(1):523.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10857-9.

Care-receivers with physical disabilities' perceptions on having humanoid assistive robots as assistants: a qualitative study

Linda Sørensen  1 , Dag Tomas Johannesen  2 , Helinä Melkas  3 , Hege Mari Johnsen  2
Affiliations

Care-receivers with physical disabilities' perceptions on having humanoid assistive robots as assistants: a qualitative study

Linda Sørensen et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: People with physical disabilities due to disease or injury face barriers to their daily activities and participation in society. Many depend on formal or informal caregivers for assistance to live independently. However, future healthcare challenges due to demographic changes threaten access to home care and assistants. Assistive technologies, such as robots for physical assistance, can support the independence and autonomy of people with physical disabilities. This study explore Norwegian care-receivers' perceptions of using robot assistance in their homes, including preferences for tasks acceptable or unacceptable for robot assistance and the underlying reasons.

Method: Purposive sampling was employed to recruit 18 participants, aged between 18 and 77 years, with differences in physical function including diagnoses such as stroke, spinal cord injury, amputations, and muscular dystrophy. Qualitative data were gathered through four focus group interviews wherein participants watched videos featuring a humanoid assistive robot, EVEr3. The collected data underwent analysis using reflexive thematic analysis.

Results: Three themes with associated sub-themes were constructed: (a) How a robot could assist in daily life, (b) The robot's appearance and functionality, and (c) Concerns about having a robot as an assistant. The participants welcomed the idea of a future robotic assistant in areas that may contribute to an increased feeling of independence and autonomy.

Conclusion: A robot assisting in activities of daily living would need to be individually customized to meet the needs of each user in terms of which tasks to assist with, how to assist in these defined tasks, and how it is controlled.

Keywords: Assistive robots; Assistive technologies; Autonomy; Independence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
EVEr3, the example robot used to illustrate assistive robots for physical assistance [41]
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization. Disability: World Health Organization; 2023 [cited 2023 13.03.23]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/disability-and-health
    1. Camebridge University Press & Assessment: Camebridge University Press & Assessment; 2024. Camebridge Dictionary.
    1. World Health Organization. World report on disability 2011. Available from: https://www.who.int/disabilities/world_report/2011/report/en/ - PubMed
    1. The Norwegian Directorate for Children Youth and Family Affairs(Bufdir) The Norwegian directorate for children YaFAB. editor. Bufdir.no: Bufdir; 2022. Deltagelse Og Fritid.
    1. Baudin K, Pettersson C. I know my rights! A longitudinal study of discrimination due to physical inaccessibility from the perspective of Wheelchair users. Assistive Technology: Shaping a Sustainable and Inclusive World; 2023. p. 403. - PubMed

Publication types