Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Sep 2;32(1):25-31.
doi: 10.4103/jmu.jmu_16_23. eCollection 2024 Jan-Mar.

Periosteal Manifestations of Osteomyelitis and Arthritis on Ultrasound: A Systematic Review

Palapun Waitayangkoon  1 , Pablo Weilg-Espejo  2 , Eugene Y Kissin  2
Affiliations
Review

Periosteal Manifestations of Osteomyelitis and Arthritis on Ultrasound: A Systematic Review

Palapun Waitayangkoon et al. J Med Ultrasound. .

Abstract

Ultrasound (US) can visualize the periosteal changes in the early stage compared to radiography. In this review, we studied periosteal manifestations on US and assessed their diagnostic utility for osteomyelitis (OM) and arthritis. We included articles that studied ultrasonographic findings of periosteal changes in OM and arthropathies with aims to systematically review periosteal manifestations of each condition and summarize diagnostic values of each finding. A total of 13 articles were included in the systematic review. Of these, 10 articles are on OM, 3 articles are on psoriatic arthritis (PsA), 1 article is on rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and 1 article is on gouty arthritis (GA). In OM, subperiosteal fluid/subperiosteal collection (SF/SC) was detected in 32%-76% within 72 h after presentation. Periosteal reaction (PR) was seen after day 4 and the sensitivity on US ranges from 33% to 100%. In PsA, PR was seen near 16%-59% in active PsA joints. Periosteal changes are rarely detected in RA joints. Small hyperechoic spots were seen in 87.5% of GA. SF/SC may be seen on US as the earliest sign followed by PR for OM. PR is more specific in PsA than RA. Further investigations on periosteal abnormalities on US are warranted to confirm our findings.

Keywords: Arthritis; osteomyelitis; periosteum; ultrasound.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Search methodology and selection process
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Situ-LaCasse E, Grieger RW, Crabbe S, Waterbrook AL, Friedman L, Adhikari S. Utility of point-of-care musculoskeletal ultrasound in the evaluation of emergency department musculoskeletal pathology. World J Emerg Med. 2018;9:262–6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rana RS, Wu JS, Eisenberg RL. Periosteal reaction. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193:W259–72. - PubMed
    1. Dwek JR. The periosteum:What is it, where is it, and what mimics it in its absence? Skeletal Radiol. 2010;39:319–23. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Orwoll ES. Toward an expanded understanding of the role of the periosteum in skeletal health. J Bone Miner Res. 2003;18:949–54. - PubMed
    1. Ragsdale BD, Madewell JE, Sweet DE. Radiologic and pathologic analysis of solitary bone lesions. Part II:Periosteal reactions. Radiol Clin North Am. 1981;19:749–83. - PubMed