Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar 28;14(4):283.
doi: 10.3390/bs14040283.

Links between Couples' Cynical Hostility and Mental Health: A Dyadic Investigation of Older Couples

Affiliations

Links between Couples' Cynical Hostility and Mental Health: A Dyadic Investigation of Older Couples

Dikla Segel-Karpas et al. Behav Sci (Basel). .

Abstract

Whereas sharing a life with someone with high cynical hostility can be straining, little is known about how partner's cynical hostility is associated with one's mental health. In this paper, we report the findings from a longitudinal dyadic study using two waves of a large and representative American sample of older adults and their spouses to examine how one's own and their spouse's cynical hostility longitudinally affect anxiety and depressive symptoms. Results from APIM analyses suggest that both husbands' and wives' anxiety and depressive symptoms were negatively associated with their own cynical hostility, both within each time point and longitudinally. Partners' cynical hostility, however, predicted only husbands' mental health cross-sectionally. Furthermore, a moderating effect was identified, although it was not consistently observed across all analyses. Specifically, when a partner's cynical hostility was high, the association between one's own cynical hostility and their mental health was stronger, especially for women. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

Keywords: anxiety; couples; cynical hostility; depression; marital relations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(ad) comparison of equality of paths.
Figure 1
Figure 1
(ad) comparison of equality of paths.
Figure 1
Figure 1
(ad) comparison of equality of paths.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Smith T.W., Glazer K., Ruiz J.M., Gallo L.C. Hostility, anger, aggressiveness, and coronary heart disease: An interpersonal perspective on personality, emotion, and health. J. Pers. 2004;72:1217–1270. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2004.00296.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Segel-Karpas D., Ayalon L. Loneliness and Hostility in Older Adults: A Cross-Lagged Model. Psychol. Aging. 2009;35:169–181. doi: 10.1037/pag0000417. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stavrova O., Ehlebracht D., Vohs K.D. Victims, perpetrators, or both? The vicious cycle of disrespect and cynical beliefs about human nature. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 2020;149:1736–1754. doi: 10.1037/xge0000738. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Segel-Karpas D., Ermer A. Cynical hostility and loneliness in older adult married couples: An indirect effect through friendships. J. Gerontol. Ser. B. 2021;76:306–316. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbaa170. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Smith T.W. Concepts and methods in the study of anger, hostility, and health. In: Siegman A.W., Smith T.W., editors. Anger, Hostility, and the Heart. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; Hillsdale, NJ, USA: 1994. pp. 23–42.

LinkOut - more resources