Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 20;14(8):851.
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14080851.

Advanced Respiratory Failure Requiring Tracheostomy-A Marker of Unfavourable Prognosis after Heart Transplantation

Affiliations

Advanced Respiratory Failure Requiring Tracheostomy-A Marker of Unfavourable Prognosis after Heart Transplantation

Marta Załęska-Kocięcka et al. Diagnostics (Basel). .

Abstract

Advanced respiratory failure with tracheostomy requirement is common in heart recipients. The aim of the study is to assess the tracheostomy rate after orthotopic heart transplantation and identify the subgroups of patients with the highest need for tracheostomy and these groups' association with mortality at a single centre through a retrospective analysis of 140 consecutive patients transplanted between December 2012 and July 2018. As many as 28.6% heart recipients suffered from advanced respiratory failure with a need for tracheostomy that was performed after a median time of 11.5 days post-transplant. Tracheostomy was associated with a history of stroke (OR 3.4; 95% CI) 1.32-8.86; p = 0.012), previous sternotomy (OR 2.5; 95% CI 1.18-5.32; p = 0.017), longer cardiopulmonary bypass time (OR 1.01; 95% CI 1.00-1.01; p = 0.007) as well as primary graft failure (OR 6.79; 95% CI2.93-15.71; p < 0.001), need of renal replacement therapy (OR 19.2; 95% 2.53-146; p = 0.004) and daily mean SOFA score up to 72 h (OR 1.50; 95% 1.23-1.71; p < 0.01). One-year mortality was significantly higher in patients requiring a tracheostomy vs. those not requiring one during their hospital stay (50% vs. 16%, p < 0.001). The need for tracheostomy in heart transplant recipients was 30% in our study. Advanced respiratory failure was associated with over 3-fold greater 1-year mortality. Thus, tracheostomy placement may be regarded as a marker of unfavourable prognosis.

Keywords: ex vivo perfusion; heart transplantation; tracheostomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of patients included in the study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Survival probability of heart transplant patients with and without tracheostomy.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Survival probability of early (<14 days) vs. late (≥14 days) trachesotomy recipients among heart transplant patients.

References

    1. De Leyn P., Bedert L., Delcroix M., Depuydt P., Lauwers G., Sokolov Y., Van Meerhaeghe A., Van Schil P. Tracheotomy: Clinical review and guidelines. EJCTS. 2007;32:412–421. - PubMed
    1. Ben-Avi R., Ben-Nun A., Levin S., Simansky D., Zeitlin N., Sternik L., Raanani E., Kogan A. Tracheostomy after cardiac surgery: Timing of tracheostomy as a risk factor for mortality. J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 2014;28:493–496. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2013.10.031. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wang D., Wang S., Du Y., Song Y., Le S., Wang H., Zhang A., Huang X., Wu L., Du X. A Predictive Scoring Model for Postoperative Tracheostomy in Patients Who Underwent Cardiac Surgery. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2022;8:799605. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.799605. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pilarczyk K., Carstens H., Heckmann J., Lubarski J., Marggraf G., Jakob H., Pizanis N., Kamler M. Safety and Efficiency of Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy with Direct Bronchoscopic Guidance for Thoracic Transplant Recipients. Respir. Care. 2016;61:235–242. doi: 10.4187/respcare.04128. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Załęska-Kocięcka M., Dutton J., Morosin M., Garda R.F., Piotrowska K., Lees N., Aw T., Sáez D.G., Simon A.R., Stock U., et al. Prognostic significance of serum lactate following cardiac transplantation. Biomark. Med. 2022;16:599–611. doi: 10.2217/bmm-2021-1041. - DOI - PubMed