New Guidelines of Pediatric Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: What Is Changing in Clinical Practice?
- PMID: 38667717
- PMCID: PMC11050217
- DOI: 10.3390/jcdd11040099
New Guidelines of Pediatric Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: What Is Changing in Clinical Practice?
Abstract
Guidelines are important tools to guide the diagnosis and treatment of patients to improve the decision-making process of health professionals. They are periodically updated according to new evidence. Four new Guidelines in 2021, 2022 and 2023 referred to pediatric pacing and defibrillation. There are some relevant changes in permanent pacing. In patients with atrioventricular block, the heart rate limit in which pacemaker implantation is recommended was decreased to reduce too-early device implantation. However, it was underlined that the heart rate criterion is not absolute, as signs or symptoms of hemodynamically not tolerated bradycardia may even occur at higher rates. In sinus node dysfunction, symptomatic bradycardia is the most relevant recommendation for pacing. Physiological pacing is increasingly used and recommended when the amount of ventricular pacing is presumed to be high. New recommendations suggest that loop recorders may guide the management of inherited arrhythmia syndromes and may be useful for severe but not frequent palpitations. Regarding defibrillator implantation, the main changes are in primary prevention recommendations. In hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, pediatric risk calculators have been included in the Guidelines. In dilated cardiomyopathy, due to the rarity of sudden cardiac death in pediatric age, low ejection fraction criteria were demoted to class II. In long QT syndrome, new criteria included severely prolonged QTc with different limits according to genotype, and some specific mutations. In arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy, hemodynamically tolerated ventricular tachycardia and arrhythmic syncope were downgraded to class II recommendation. In conclusion, these new Guidelines aim to assess all aspects of cardiac implantable electronic devices and improve treatment strategies.
Keywords: bradyarrhythmia; cardiac pacing; defibrillator; guidelines; pediatric age; sudden cardiac death; tachyarrhythmia.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
 
              
              
              
              
                
                
                 
              
              
              
              
                
                
                References
- 
    - Frye R.L., Collins J.J., DeSanctis R.W., Dodge H.T., Dreifus L.S., Fisch C. Guidelines for permanent pacemaker implantation, 1984. A report of the Joint American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Cardiovascular Procedures (Sub-committee on Pacemaker Implantation) Circulation. 1984;70:331A–339A. - PubMed
 
- 
    - Kusumoto F.M., Schoenfeld M.H., Barrett C., Edgerton J.R., Ellenbogen K.A., Gold M.R. 2018 ACC/AHA/HRS guideline on the evaluation and management of patients with bradycardia and cardiac conduction delay: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines, and the Heart Rhythm Society. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2019;74:932–987. - PubMed
 
- 
    - Levine G.N., O’Gara P.T., Beckman J.A., Al-Khatib S.M., Birtcher K.K., Cigarroa J.E. Recent innovations, modifications, and evolution of ACC/AHA clinical practice Guidelines: An update for our constituencies: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2019;139:e879–e886. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000651. - DOI - PubMed
 
- 
    - Halperin J.L., Levine G.N., Al-Khatib S.M., Birtcher K.K., Bozkurt B., Brindis R.G. Further evolution of the ACC/AHA clinical practice guideline recommen-dation classification system: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2016;67:1572–1574. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.09.001. - DOI - PubMed
 
- 
    - Kusumoto F.M., Calkins H., Boehmer J., Buxton A.E., Chung M.K., Gold M.R. HRS/ACC/AHA expert consensus statement on the use of implantable cardi-overter-defibrillator therapy in patients who are not included or not well represented in clinical trials. Circulation. 2014;130:94–125. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000056. - DOI - PubMed
 
Publication types
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
- Full Text Sources
 
        