Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 25;73(16):365-371.
doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7316a2.

SARS-CoV-2 Viral Shedding and Rapid Antigen Test Performance - Respiratory Virus Transmission Network, November 2022-May 2023

Collaborators, Affiliations

SARS-CoV-2 Viral Shedding and Rapid Antigen Test Performance - Respiratory Virus Transmission Network, November 2022-May 2023

Sarah E Smith-Jeffcoat et al. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. .

Abstract

As population immunity to SARS-CoV-2 evolves and new variants emerge, the role and accuracy of antigen tests remain active questions. To describe recent test performance, the detection of SARS-CoV-2 by antigen testing was compared with that by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and viral culture testing during November 2022-May 2023. Participants who were enrolled in a household transmission study completed daily symptom diaries and collected two nasal swabs (tested for SARS-CoV-2 via RT-PCR, culture, and antigen tests) each day for 10 days after enrollment. Among participants with SARS-CoV-2 infection, the percentages of positive antigen, RT-PCR, and culture results were calculated each day from the onset of symptoms or, in asymptomatic persons, from the date of the first positive test result. Antigen test sensitivity was calculated using RT-PCR and viral culture as references. The peak percentage of positive antigen (59.0%) and RT-PCR (83.0%) results occurred 3 days after onset, and the peak percentage of positive culture results (52%) occurred 2 days after onset. The sensitivity of antigen tests was 47% (95% CI = 44%-50%) and 80% (95% CI = 76%-85%) using RT-PCR and culture, respectively, as references. Clinicians should be aware of the lower sensitivity of antigen testing compared with RT-PCR, which might lead to false-negative results. This finding has implications for timely initiation of SARS-CoV-2 antiviral treatment, when early diagnosis is essential; clinicians should consider RT-PCR for persons for whom antiviral treatment is recommended. Persons in the community who are at high risk for severe COVID-19 illness and eligible for antiviral treatment should seek testing from health care providers with the goal of obtaining a more sensitive diagnostic test than antigen tests (i.e., an RT-PCR test).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors have completed and submitted the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. Edwin J. Asturias reports grant support from Pfizer, consulting fees from Hillevax and Moderna, and payment from Merck for a lecture delivered at the Latin American Vaccine Summit. Carlos G. Grijalva reports support from the Food and Drug Administration and grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Syneos Health. Son H. McLaren reports institutional support from the Respiratory Virus Transmission Network, receipt of the Ken Graff Young Investigator Award from the American Academy of Pediatrics, Section on Emergency Medicine, institutional support from the National Center for Advancing Translational Science, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, and the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation COVID-19 Fund to Retain Clinician-Scientists. Suchitra Rao reports grant support from Biofire. Melissa S. Stockwell reports institutional support from the University of Washington, Boston Children’s Hospital, Westat, and New York University, and service as the Associate Director of the American Academy of Pediatrics Pediatric Research in Office Settings Research Network (payment to the trustees of Columbia University). Huong Q. Nguyen reports research support from CSL Seqirus, GSK, and ModernaTX, and an honorarium from ModernaTX for participating in a consultancy group, outside the submitted work. No other potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Percentage of rapid antigen, reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction, and viral culture test results that were positive for SARS-CoV-2 (A) and percentage of antigen test results that were positive, by symptom status† (B) and presence of fever (C) each day since onset among participants infected with SARS-CoV-2 — Respiratory Virus Transmission Network, November 2022–May 2023 Abbreviation: RT-PCR = reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction. * With 95% CIs indicated by shaded areas. Elicited COVID-19 signs and symptoms included fever (including feeling feverish or chills), cough, sore throat, runny nose, nasal congestion, fatigue (including feeling run-down), wheezing, trouble breathing (including shortness of breath), chest tightness (including chest pain), loss of smell or loss of taste, headache, abdominal pain, diarrhea, vomiting, and muscle or body aches. § Date of symptom onset or, for asymptomatic persons, date of first positive test result. SARS-CoV-2 infection defined as having received at least one positive RT-PCR test result during study testing.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Sensitivity of rapid antigen tests results for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 infection compared with reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (A) and viral culture (B), overall and by presence of symptoms — Respiratory Virus Transmission Network, November 2022–May 2023 Abbreviation: RT-PCR = reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction. * With 95% CIs indicated by error bars. Elicited COVID-19 signs and symptoms included fever (including feeling feverish or chills), cough, sore throat, runny nose, nasal congestion, fatigue (including feeling run-down), wheezing, trouble breathing (including shortness of breath), chest tightness (including chest pain), loss of smell or loss of taste, headache, abdominal pain, diarrhea, vomiting, and muscle or body aches.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Qasmieh SA, Robertson MM, Rane MS, et al. The importance of incorporating at-home testing into SARS-CoV-2 point prevalence estimates: findings from a US national cohort, February 2022. JMIR Public Health Surveill 2022;8:e38196. 10.2196/38196 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rader B, Gertz A, Iuliano AD, et al. Use of at-home COVID-19 tests—United States, August 23, 2021–March 12, 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2022;71:489–94. 10.15585/mmwr.mm7113e1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chu VT, Schwartz NG, Donnelly MAP, et al.; COVID-19 Household Transmission Team. Comparison of home antigen testing with RT-PCR and viral culture during the course of SARS-CoV-2 infection. JAMA Intern Med 2022;182:701–9. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.1827 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tu Y-P, Green C, Hao L, et al. COVID-19 antigen results correlate with the quantity of replication-competent SARS-CoV-2 in a cross-sectional study of ambulatory adults during the Delta wave. Microbiol Spectr 2023;11:e0006423. 10.1128/spectrum.00064-23 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Almendares O, Prince-Guerra JL, Nolen LD, et al.; CDC COVID-19 Surge Diagnostic Testing Laboratory. Performance characteristics of the Abbott BinaxNOW SARS-CoV-2 antigen test in comparison to real-time reverse transcriptase PCR and viral culture in community testing sites during November 2020. J Clin Microbiol 2022;60:e0174221. 10.1128/JCM.01742-21 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Substances