Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec 9;15(3):198-202.
doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2023-102555. eCollection 2024 May.

Colonoscopic cancer detection rate: a new performance measure - is it FIT for purpose?

Affiliations

Colonoscopic cancer detection rate: a new performance measure - is it FIT for purpose?

Khalid Bashir et al. Frontline Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Introduction: Gastrointestinal symptoms correlate poorly with cancer diagnosis. A faecal immunochemical test (FIT) result of ≥10 µg has high sensitivity and negative predictive value for colorectal cancer (CRC) detection. An FIT-based diagnostic pathway may lead to more effective resource utilisation. We aimed to use National Endoscopy Database (NED) data to create a new colonoscopy performance measure, cancer detection rate (CDR) to assess the appropriate identification of target populations for colonoscopy; then to use CDR to assess the impact of implementing an FIT-based referral pathway locally.

Methods: NED data were analysed to compare local diagnostic colonoscopic CDR in 2019 (prepathway revision) and 2021 (postpathway revision), benchmarked against overall national CDR for the same time frames.

Results: 1, 123, 624 NED diagnostic colonoscopies were analysed. Locally, there was a significant increase in CDR between 2019 and 2021, from 3.01% (2.45%-3.47%) to 4.32% (3.69%-4.95%), p=0.003. The CDR increase was due to both a 10% increase in the number of CRCs detected and a 25% reduction in the number of diagnostic colonoscopies performed. Nationally, there was a smaller, but significant, increase in CDR from 2.02% (1.99%-2.07%) to 2.33% (2.29%-2.37%), p<0.001. The rate of increase in CDR% between 2019 and 2021 was significantly different locally compared with nationally.

Conclusion: Our study indicates that the introduction of a robustly vetted FIT-based algorithm to determine whether diagnostic colonoscopy is required, is effective in increasing the colonoscopic CDR. Moreover, CDR appears to be a meaningful performance metric that can be automatically calculated through NED, enabling monitoring of the quality of referral and vetting pathways.

Keywords: colorectal cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Simplified lower gastrointestinal (GI) investigation subalgorithm of the NCA combined GI referral pathway. CTC, computed tomography colonoscopy scan. CT CAP, computed tomography scan of the chest, abdomen and pelvis; NCA, Northern Cancer Alliance.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean yearly local and national (excluding local) CDR% (95% CI) for 2019 and 2021. CDR, cancer detection rate.

References

    1. UK BC . Facts and figures on bowel cancer. 2023.
    1. Quyn AJ, Steele RJ, Digby J, et al. . Application of NICE guideline Ng12 to the initial assessment of patients with lower gastrointestinal symptoms: not FIT for purpose Ann Clin Biochem 2018;55:69–76. 10.1177/0004563217707981 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jellema P, van der Windt DAWM, Bruinvels DJ, et al. . Value of symptoms and additional diagnostic tests for colorectal cancer in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2010;340:c1269. 10.1136/bmj.c1269 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Morris EJA, Goldacre R, Spata E, et al. . Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the detection and management of colorectal cancer in England: a population-based study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021;6:199–208.:S2468-1253(21)00005-4. 10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00005-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. NHS England . Diagnostic Waiting Times and Activity Report 2022.

LinkOut - more resources