Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2024 Sep 15;155(6):979-987.
doi: 10.1002/ijc.34968. Epub 2024 Apr 26.

A comparative analysis of risk factor associations with interval and screen-detected breast cancers: A large UK prospective study

Isobel Barnes  1 , Montserrat Garcia-Closas  2 , Toral Gathani  1   3 , Siân Sweetland  1 , Sarah Floud  1 , Gillian K Reeves  1 ; Million Women Study Collaborators
Collaborators, Affiliations
Comparative Study

A comparative analysis of risk factor associations with interval and screen-detected breast cancers: A large UK prospective study

Isobel Barnes et al. Int J Cancer. .

Abstract

The associations of certain factors, such as age and menopausal hormone therapy, with breast cancer risk are known to differ for interval and screen-detected cancers. However, the extent to which associations of other established breast cancer risk factors differ by mode of detection is unclear. We investigated associations of a wide range of risk factors using data from a large UK cohort with linkage to the National Health Service Breast Screening Programme, cancer registration, and other health records. We used Cox regression to estimate adjusted relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations between risk factors and breast cancer risk. A total of 9421 screen-detected and 5166 interval cancers were diagnosed in 517,555 women who were followed for an average of 9.72 years. We observed the following differences in risk factor associations by mode of detection: greater body mass index (BMI) was associated with a smaller increased risk of interval (RR per 5 unit increase 1.07, 95% CI 1.03-1.11) than screen-detected cancer (RR 1.27, 1.23-1.30); having a first-degree family history was associated with a greater increased risk of interval (RR 1.81, 1.68-1.95) than screen-detected cancer (RR 1.52, 1.43-1.61); and having had previous breast surgery was associated with a greater increased risk of interval (RR 1.85, 1.72-1.99) than screen-detected cancer (RR 1.34, 1.26-1.42). As these differences in associations were relatively unchanged after adjustment for tumour grade, and are in line with the effects of these factors on mammographic density, they are likely to reflect the effects of these risk factors on screening sensitivity.

Keywords: breast cancer; interval cancer; screening; screen‐detected cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Breast Screening: Reporting, Classification and Monitoring of Interval Cancers and Cancers Following Previous Assessment. PHE Publications Gateway number GW‐1444 HTML; 2021.
    1. Lowery JT, Byers T, Hokanson JE, et al. Complementary approaches to assessing risk factors for interval breast cancer. Cancer Cause Control. 2011;22(1):23‐31.
    1. Boyd NF, Huszti E, Melnichouk O, et al. Mammographic features associated with interval breast cancers in screening programs. Breast Cancer Res. 2014;16(4):417.
    1. Bennett RL, Sellars SJ, Moss SM. Interval cancers in the NHS breast cancer screening programme in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Br J Cancer. 2011;104(4):571‐577.
    1. Gaudet MM, Deubler E, Diver WR, et al. Breast cancer risk factors by mode of detection among screened women in the cancer prevention study‐II. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021;186(3):791‐805.

Publication types