Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 26;19(4):e0301886.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301886. eCollection 2024.

The role of sociodemographic factors on the acceptability of digital mental health care: A scoping review protocol

Nagi Abouzeid  1   2 , Shalini Lal  1   2   3
Affiliations

The role of sociodemographic factors on the acceptability of digital mental health care: A scoping review protocol

Nagi Abouzeid et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Introduction: Many individuals experiencing mental health complications face barriers when attempting to access services. To bridge this care gap, digital mental health innovations (DMHI) have proven to be valuable additions to in-person care by enhancing access to care. An important aspect to consider when evaluating the utility of DMHI is perceived acceptability. However, it is unclear whether diverse sociodemographic groups differ in their degree of perceived acceptability of DMHI.

Objective: This scoping review aims to synthesize evidence on the role of sociodemographic factors (e.g., age, gender) in the perceived acceptability of DMHI among individuals seeking mental health care.

Methods: Guided by the JBI Manual of Evidence Synthesis, chapter on Scoping Review, a search strategy developed according to the PCC framework will be implemented in MEDLINE and then adapted to four electronic databases (i.e., CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and EMBASE). The study selection strategy will be piloted by two reviewers on subsets of 30 articles until agreement among reviewers reaches 90%, after which one reviewer will complete the remaining screening of titles and abstracts. The full-text screening, data extraction strategy, and charting tool will be completed by one reviewer and then validated by a second member of the team. Main findings will be presented using tables and figures.

Expected contributions: This scoping review will examine the extent to which sociodemographic factors have been considered in the digital mental health literature. Also, the proposed review may help determine whether certain populations have been associated with a lower level of acceptability within the context of digital mental health care. This investigation aims to favor equitable access to DMHI among diverse populations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

SL is an Associate Professor at the University of Montreal and leads a research program in the field of digital mental health. In the past 5 years SL has received research funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Canada Research Chairs program, Hoffman-La Roche, Foundation of Stars to advance this work. All of these are unrelated to this specific study. NA is a graduate student at the University of Montreal and is conducting this work towards partial fulfillment of requirements for a Masters of Science degree under the supervision of SL. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials

References

    1. Andrade LH, Alonso J, Mneimneh Z, Wells JE, Al-Hamzawi A, Borges G, et al.. Barriers to mental health treatment: results from the WHO World Mental Health surveys. Psychol Med. 2014;44(6):1303–17. doi: 10.1017/S0033291713001943 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fu Z, Burger H, Arjadi R, Bockting CL. Effectiveness of digital psychological interventions for mental health problems in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet psychiatry. 2020. Oct 1;7(10):851–64. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30256-X - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lal S, Adair CE. E-mental health: a rapid review of the literature. Psychiatr serv. 2014. Jan;65(1):24–32. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201300009 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lattie EG, Stiles-Shields C, Graham AK. An overview of and recommendations for more accessible digital mental health services. Nat rev psychol. 2022. Feb;1(2):87–100. doi: 10.1038/s44159-021-00003-1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lehtimaki S, Martic J, Wahl B, Foster KT, Schwalbe N. Evidence on digital mental health interventions for adolescents and young people: systematic overview. JMIR ment health. 2021. Apr 29;8(4):e25847. doi: 10.2196/25847 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms